nightcrawler_steve wrote:Why do we have to read a bunch of off-topic CRAP to get to the meat of the original thread. According to superman, we should just stop when a thread is hijacked and move on - or wait - tolerate it. Yeah.
I do not support or condone thread hijacking. If you are going to reference something I've said, please read the words I type and respond accordingly.
BadDazeRob wrote:• If a topic doesn't interest you or if you feel a thread or post is pointless, annoying and a waste of space and time, then skip it.
This means if you see a thread (all must have a title before they can be entered into the forum) and you think it's ridiculous or of little interest to you, then don't read it.
It's a TOTALLY DIFFERENT situation when a thread is hijacked and that, as JP has explained, is being monitored. However, it is pretty easy in most cases to decide whether a comment within a thread is going to be insightful or destructive simply by looking at the avatar and name next to it, especially if you're a veteran member of Rockpage.
Steve, if you truly miss the "good music discussions that use to be common place here," then start some. If you don't like the music discussion to crap discussion ratio, do something to change it by adding to the value of the content instead of bitching about the content.
PS: "Drinking the Kool-Aid" implies giving up free thought and conforming to someone else's ideals. I
NEVER said submit to any poster's will or subscribe to anyone's philospohy. All I'm saying is if you don't like ESPN, turn the channel to FX or Spike. Every thread has the potential for being a great "station." Of course, if you go to a thread and don't like what you see, change the "channel" or, better yet, start a new one.
There are already too many Jerry Fallwells in this world.
r:>)
That's what she said.