THE POLITICAL ARENA!!! Political Gladiators Inside!!
-
- Diamond Member
- Posts: 6990
- Joined: Thursday Oct 28, 2004
- Location: Not here ..
Now I understand. You Joe (edit: to insert "Joe") were TOLD to call anyone a fascist who supports ANY law that intrudes on your hallowed sphere of individual autonomy.
Even if said views are anti - American or anti - Christian. Your sphere is a hallowed one and comes before anyone else. Perhaps Ayn Rand is the anti - Christ. And you are obviously a cult follower. You know, the kind that isn't allowed to read anything that might go against the cult, it's leader and it's followers. The kind that doesn't allow you to remove the blinders. That's why you can't read articles. You can only parrot the cult sound bite, "fascist" to anyone who disagrees. WOW, it is all so clear now. I should have noticed this a long time ago.
Now I understand completely why you are the way you are and why your responses fall completely in line (lockstep) with your cult. This is why, when you don't have an answer, you make up some absurd exaggeration of my point to defer criticism away from your SELF centered point of view. Then follow up with calling me a fascist...
Sorry Joe, Now that I see what happened to you I can only pity you. I have always felt sorry for people who get caught up in a cult. Just like the party that followed Hitler, the Nazis. They had their fantasy of autonomy just like you Joe. They had that fantasy that dog (in this case Germany) eat dog was how life should be. And they had another thing that kept the cult strong. The Jews. The cult taught them to hate the Jews. That way, no matter what was wrong or anything that had ever been wrong, they had someone to blame. Seems to me you could insert "laws" for Jews. Hate the ones who enforce the laws. Hate, hate, hate.
While you might claim to hate no one, the hate is in between the lines when it's not in the lines. Hence your never ending frustration. You are very Nazi like with your inability to compromise on one single cult point of view. It's all or nothing, like any good lock stepper - goose stepper.
These paragraphs sum up EVERYTHING you have professed:
Rand's book Atlas Shrugged, for instance, remains a towering monument to humanity's capacity for unrestrained self-pity—it's a bizarre and incredibly long-winded piece of aristocratic paranoia in which a group of Randian supermen decide to break off from the rest of society and form a pure free-market Utopia, and naturally the parasitic lower classes immediately drown in their own laziness and ineptitude...
This is pure social Darwinism: self-interest is moral, interference (particularly governmental interference) with self-interest is evil, a fancy version of the Gordon Gekko pabulum that "greed is good." When you dig deeper into Rand's philosophy, you keep coming up with more of the same.
And more Joe like / Rand cult phylosophy I see in Joe:
According to objectivists, the belief in "objective reality" means that "facts are facts" and "wishing" won't make facts change. What it actually means is "When I'm right, I'm right" and "My facts are facts and your facts are not facts."
This belief in "objective reality" is what gives objectivists their characteristic dickish attitude: since they don't really believe that facts look different from different points of view, they don't feel the need to question themselves or look at things through the eyes of others.
Even if said views are anti - American or anti - Christian. Your sphere is a hallowed one and comes before anyone else. Perhaps Ayn Rand is the anti - Christ. And you are obviously a cult follower. You know, the kind that isn't allowed to read anything that might go against the cult, it's leader and it's followers. The kind that doesn't allow you to remove the blinders. That's why you can't read articles. You can only parrot the cult sound bite, "fascist" to anyone who disagrees. WOW, it is all so clear now. I should have noticed this a long time ago.
Now I understand completely why you are the way you are and why your responses fall completely in line (lockstep) with your cult. This is why, when you don't have an answer, you make up some absurd exaggeration of my point to defer criticism away from your SELF centered point of view. Then follow up with calling me a fascist...
Sorry Joe, Now that I see what happened to you I can only pity you. I have always felt sorry for people who get caught up in a cult. Just like the party that followed Hitler, the Nazis. They had their fantasy of autonomy just like you Joe. They had that fantasy that dog (in this case Germany) eat dog was how life should be. And they had another thing that kept the cult strong. The Jews. The cult taught them to hate the Jews. That way, no matter what was wrong or anything that had ever been wrong, they had someone to blame. Seems to me you could insert "laws" for Jews. Hate the ones who enforce the laws. Hate, hate, hate.
While you might claim to hate no one, the hate is in between the lines when it's not in the lines. Hence your never ending frustration. You are very Nazi like with your inability to compromise on one single cult point of view. It's all or nothing, like any good lock stepper - goose stepper.
These paragraphs sum up EVERYTHING you have professed:
Rand's book Atlas Shrugged, for instance, remains a towering monument to humanity's capacity for unrestrained self-pity—it's a bizarre and incredibly long-winded piece of aristocratic paranoia in which a group of Randian supermen decide to break off from the rest of society and form a pure free-market Utopia, and naturally the parasitic lower classes immediately drown in their own laziness and ineptitude...
This is pure social Darwinism: self-interest is moral, interference (particularly governmental interference) with self-interest is evil, a fancy version of the Gordon Gekko pabulum that "greed is good." When you dig deeper into Rand's philosophy, you keep coming up with more of the same.
And more Joe like / Rand cult phylosophy I see in Joe:
According to objectivists, the belief in "objective reality" means that "facts are facts" and "wishing" won't make facts change. What it actually means is "When I'm right, I'm right" and "My facts are facts and your facts are not facts."
This belief in "objective reality" is what gives objectivists their characteristic dickish attitude: since they don't really believe that facts look different from different points of view, they don't feel the need to question themselves or look at things through the eyes of others.
Last edited by Hawk on Sunday Sep 11, 2011, edited 3 times in total.
As I have stated, money buys things on both sides. have you read the Michael Lofgren article ?f.sciarrillo wrote:Did I see Soros mentioned? You mean the billionaire who is spending all his money on bribes to the democratic party? I wonder how much taxes he pays? I will bet none.
Now why would you say no taxes paid by Soros ? This is why I say you make things up. Do some research, then tell us with facts rather than slanted, biased conjecture.
Now would you tell me why it is the Republicans don't want to close those loopholes and the Democrats want to close the loopholes. Which side do you fall on Frank ? Close them or not ?
In bed with the devil for the purpose of "SELF" autonomy.
Paul gets Joe's vote...
So what if Stormfront founder Don Black donated to the Ron Paul campaign and Paul cheerfully accepted? So what if Ron Paul posed for a picture with Don Black, the man behind Stormfront, a notorious neo-Nazi “white power” website? So what if Stormfront is 100% behind Ron Paul because they find common cause with the Presidential candidate?
Go figure ? Libertarian in bed with a neo-Nazi white supremacist ?
Wake up Joe, get yourself out of that Rand cult...
Paul gets Joe's vote...
So what if Stormfront founder Don Black donated to the Ron Paul campaign and Paul cheerfully accepted? So what if Ron Paul posed for a picture with Don Black, the man behind Stormfront, a notorious neo-Nazi “white power” website? So what if Stormfront is 100% behind Ron Paul because they find common cause with the Presidential candidate?
Go figure ? Libertarian in bed with a neo-Nazi white supremacist ?
Wake up Joe, get yourself out of that Rand cult...
Any different that a Marxist fascist like George Soros wants the illegal Kenyan to win? Terrorist groups like Hamas support the Kenyan. Bill supports Marxists and Middle East terrorists. Your logic is so twisted, but so is your soul.Hawk wrote:In bed with the devil for the purpose of "SELF" autonomy.
Paul gets Joe's vote...
So what if Stormfront founder Don Black donated to the Ron Paul campaign and Paul cheerfully accepted? So what if Ron Paul posed for a picture with Don Black, the man behind Stormfront, a notorious neo-Nazi “white power” website? So what if Stormfront is 100% behind Ron Paul because they find common cause with the Presidential candidate?
I got you now Joe. You just go on with the self love of your hallowed sphere and self pity that we have poor people that easily could be eliminated via the Ayn Rand system of Utopia.undercoverjoe wrote:Any different that a Marxist fascist like George Soros wants the illegal Kenyan to win? Terrorist groups like Hamas support the Kenyan. Bill supports Marxists and Middle East terrorists. Your logic is so twisted, but so is your soul.Hawk wrote:In bed with the devil for the purpose of "SELF" autonomy.
Paul gets Joe's vote...
So what if Stormfront founder Don Black donated to the Ron Paul campaign and Paul cheerfully accepted? So what if Ron Paul posed for a picture with Don Black, the man behind Stormfront, a notorious neo-Nazi “white power” website? So what if Stormfront is 100% behind Ron Paul because they find common cause with the Presidential candidate?
No matter what you say from here on, everything you say is framed by the cult of Rand. I know now too that you are required by the cult to call us names like fascist and Marxist. Doesn't work anymore Joe, because I know you are only following cult orders.
These guys never make sense. Joe's pissed off that GE paid no taxes. They tell us how taxes to the rich and to business is bad then bitch when they don't pay taxes.songsmith wrote:I thought rich guys not paying taxes was a GOOD thing?
Their facts are facts and any other facts are just wrong opinions...That's the Ayn Rand cult way of objective reality.
-
- Diamond Member
- Posts: 6990
- Joined: Thursday Oct 28, 2004
- Location: Not here ..
Once again, you didn't read what I said. Let me say it again: "I wonder how much taxes he pays? I will bet none." I was asking a question, not making a point. Other-words, I don't know if he pays taxes or not, but since he is in bed with the dems, it wouldn't surprise me if he didn'tHawk wrote:Now why would you say no taxes paid by Soros ? This is why I say you make things up. Do some research, then tell us with facts rather than slanted, biased conjecture.
Music Rocks!
-
- Diamond Member
- Posts: 6990
- Joined: Thursday Oct 28, 2004
- Location: Not here ..
If you would actually read my posts instead of consistently bitching about the tea party, you would have seen that I said that I have no issues with paying taxes. My issue when you pay too much in taxes. Like you liberals, for example, want us to pay 78%+ of our paychecks in taxes.songsmith wrote:I thought rich guys not paying taxes was a GOOD thing?
Music Rocks!
Huh ? Why does Obama want to keep payroll tax cuts and the Republicans want them to end ?f.sciarrillo wrote:If you would actually read my posts instead of consistently bitching about the tea party, you would have seen that I said that I have no issues with paying taxes. My issue when you pay too much in taxes. Like you liberals, for example, want us to pay 78%+ of our paychecks in taxes.songsmith wrote:I thought rich guys not paying taxes was a GOOD thing?
Now you did say, "Like the Liberals, for example, want us to pay 78%+ of our payroll taxes" didn't you ? Then please explain how the liberals want payroll taxes continued to be CUT ? Republicans DON'T ?
How is it that you (wrongly) think being a supporter of democrats forgives IRS laws. If there are loopholes to use, Obama didn't put them there. And if Soros broke said laws, he'd be in jail. Who you know does not affect what you pay, the tax laws affect what you pay.f.sciarrillo wrote:Once again, you didn't read what I said. Let me say it again: "I wonder how much taxes he pays? I will bet none." I was asking a question, not making a point. Other-words, I don't know if he pays taxes or not, but since he is in bed with the dems, it wouldn't surprise me if he didn'tHawk wrote:Now why would you say no taxes paid by Soros ? This is why I say you make things up. Do some research, then tell us with facts rather than slanted, biased conjecture.
Tim Geitner, Sect. of Treasury did not pay income taxes for several years. Most of us would end up in jail for that, he got promoted to a Cabinet level position in the Marxist Kenyan's administration. Who are you trying to kid that who you know does not count?????????????? You are either very naive or or very stupid?Hawk wrote:How is it that you (wrongly) think being a supporter of democrats forgives IRS laws. If there are loopholes to use, Obama didn't put them there. And if Soros broke said laws, he'd be in jail. Who you know does not affect what you pay, the tax laws affect what you pay.f.sciarrillo wrote:Once again, you didn't read what I said. Let me say it again: "I wonder how much taxes he pays? I will bet none." I was asking a question, not making a point. Other-words, I don't know if he pays taxes or not, but since he is in bed with the dems, it wouldn't surprise me if he didn'tHawk wrote:Now why would you say no taxes paid by Soros ? This is why I say you make things up. Do some research, then tell us with facts rather than slanted, biased conjecture.
- lonewolf
- Diamond Member
- Posts: 6249
- Joined: Thursday Sep 25, 2003
- Location: Anywhere, Earth
- Contact:
Incorrect. Both parties say they want to close tax loopholes. Neither party has actually done or will do anything about it.Hawk wrote:Now would you tell me why it is the Republicans don't want to close those loopholes and the Democrats want to close the loopholes.
If the democrats really wanted to close tax loopholes, they would have done it during the two years they had supermajorities.
Remember: How can you tell when a politician is lying?
You can see their lips moving.
I'll also venture to say that we will never, ever see the elimination of the biggest loophole of all...you know...the one for the financial and construction industries.
...Oh, the freedom of the day that yielded to no rule or time...
Obama did disappointment a lot of liberals by not getting things done when he had a majority congress to work with.lonewolf wrote:Incorrect. Both parties say they want to close tax loopholes. Neither party has actually done or will do anything about it.Hawk wrote:Now would you tell me why it is the Republicans don't want to close those loopholes and the Democrats want to close the loopholes.
If the democrats really wanted to close tax loopholes, they would have done it during the two years they had supermajorities.
Remember: How can you tell when a politician is lying?
You can see their lips moving.
I'll also venture to say that we will never, ever see the elimination of the biggest loophole of all...you know...the one for the financial and construction industries.
No comments on this Republican and his opinion ? Which represents all Re publican's opinions...Hawk wrote:This hypocrisy cracks me up.
I just heard Republican Representative Tim Huelskamp explain that the Republicans could not extend the payroll tax cuts because "We'd have to borrow more money". Where the hell is that same logic with the tax cuts to the top 2% ?
Republicans want to screw the middle class and you guys cheer them on. Makes no sense.
He also said he wants to cut environmental regulations. What ? It okay to poision the next generation as long as we don't leave them in debt ?
Mercury in fish is already a problem. Dangerous to very young children. It comes from burning coal. But hey, if we can let the companies pollute at their own will to save a few bucks, let's eat mercury ! Damn the health of the next generation, money is more important...
The only comment Joe could point out was that coal was burning to power my PC. I don't care if they burn coal, I was for cap and trade to reduce pollutants. Joe, due to his alliance with the Ayn Rand cult, is not for reducing polution if it cost money. That's called being selfish.
-
- Diamond Member
- Posts: 6990
- Joined: Thursday Oct 28, 2004
- Location: Not here ..
They have to borrow money anyway you look at it, Bill. Where is the logic in that? We borrow .60 cents of every dollar. Where is the logic in that? We shouldn't have to be borrowing anything. I guess it is something the government seriously needs to work on. Then, if they wouldn't have passes the failed stimulus, things might be different.
I don't remember, did they borrow money to help pay for Obamacare as well? or is that all being paid for by raising taxes?
I don't remember, did they borrow money to help pay for Obamacare as well? or is that all being paid for by raising taxes?
Music Rocks!
I really don't know how you can call a capitalist a Marxist, other then you are required to by your anti - Christ god Ayn Rand.undercoverjoe wrote:Any different that a Marxist fascist like George Soros wants the illegal Kenyan to win? Terrorist groups like Hamas support the Kenyan. Bill supports Marxists and Middle East terrorists. Your logic is so twisted, but so is your soul.Hawk wrote:In bed with the devil for the purpose of "SELF" autonomy.
Paul gets Joe's vote...
So what if Stormfront founder Don Black donated to the Ron Paul campaign and Paul cheerfully accepted? So what if Ron Paul posed for a picture with Don Black, the man behind Stormfront, a notorious neo-Nazi “white power” website? So what if Stormfront is 100% behind Ron Paul because they find common cause with the Presidential candidate?
Really, has Obama contributed to Hamas like Ron Paul has to Stormfront white supremacist Don Black? I knew Libertarians supported race discrimination. It's interesting to discover your leader is in bed with them.
Joe was told to call anyone a fascist who supports ANY law that intrudes on his hallowed sphere of individual autonomy.
Joe's typical answers based on his Randroid cult is to exaggerate my opinion to the point of absurdity and to call me a name like"fascist".
Exactly, if they let the taxes to the rich go back as they were scheduled to do by Bush, we would borrow less. The Republicans are for borrowing to cover these tax cuts but are against payroll tax cuts to the middle class. Hypocrites !f.sciarrillo wrote:They have to borrow money anyway you look at it, Bill. Where is the logic in that? We borrow .60 cents of every dollar. Where is the logic in that? We shouldn't have to be borrowing anything. I guess it is something the government seriously needs to work on. Then, if they wouldn't have passes the failed stimulus, things might be different.
I don't remember, did they borrow money to help pay for Obamacare as well? or is that all being paid for by raising taxes?
Bill supports fascist authoritarian government just like the Nazis did in Germany. This corrupt administration has already called the Tea Party terrorists and have their minions (union thugs) tell their cronies to wipe them out. Bill, will you help build the concentration camps, gas showers and ovens when the Kenyan fuhrer tells you to?Hawk wrote:I really don't know how you can call a capitalist a Marxist, other then you are required to by your anti - Christ god Ayn Rand.undercoverjoe wrote:Any different that a Marxist fascist like George Soros wants the illegal Kenyan to win? Terrorist groups like Hamas support the Kenyan. Bill supports Marxists and Middle East terrorists. Your logic is so twisted, but so is your soul.Hawk wrote:In bed with the devil for the purpose of "SELF" autonomy.
Paul gets Joe's vote...
So what if Stormfront founder Don Black donated to the Ron Paul campaign and Paul cheerfully accepted? So what if Ron Paul posed for a picture with Don Black, the man behind Stormfront, a notorious neo-Nazi “white power” website? So what if Stormfront is 100% behind Ron Paul because they find common cause with the Presidential candidate?
Really, has Obama contributed to Hamas like Ron Paul has to Stormfront white supremacist Don Black? I knew Libertarians supported race discrimination. It's interesting to discover your leader is in bed with them.
Joe was told to call anyone a fascist who supports ANY law that intrudes on his hallowed sphere of individual autonomy.
Joe's typical answers based on his Randroid cult is to exaggerate my opinion to the point of absurdity and to call me a name like"fascist".
New drinking game:
Rule #1-- Everytime a certain person says any of the following, take a drink:
Marxist, Kenyan (my personal Birther fave), socialist (must take two sips), fascist, corrupt, authoritarian (he'd know about authoritarian better than anyone), cronies, Nazi, communist, Obamacare, unconstitutional, or kool-aid.
Rule #2-- Every time he mentions Ron Paul you have to immediately take 3 drinks, grab your junk and say, "Mmmmm, Ron Paul!" If you don't, you have to chug the rest of the bottle.
Rule #3-- Every time he sidesteps a question with a personal attack on someone, everyone must rub their bellies and pat their head, and say all the words in #1. If you don't, you have to chug everyone else's drink.
Rule #5-- If he posts something credible, or somehow adds to the give-and-take of political discourse, the game is over.
Rule #6-- There is no Rule #4. Rule #4 was supposed to be about George W. Bush, but he now never existed.
Man, we are gonna get SO wasted!

Rule #1-- Everytime a certain person says any of the following, take a drink:
Marxist, Kenyan (my personal Birther fave), socialist (must take two sips), fascist, corrupt, authoritarian (he'd know about authoritarian better than anyone), cronies, Nazi, communist, Obamacare, unconstitutional, or kool-aid.
Rule #2-- Every time he mentions Ron Paul you have to immediately take 3 drinks, grab your junk and say, "Mmmmm, Ron Paul!" If you don't, you have to chug the rest of the bottle.
Rule #3-- Every time he sidesteps a question with a personal attack on someone, everyone must rub their bellies and pat their head, and say all the words in #1. If you don't, you have to chug everyone else's drink.
Rule #5-- If he posts something credible, or somehow adds to the give-and-take of political discourse, the game is over.
Rule #6-- There is no Rule #4. Rule #4 was supposed to be about George W. Bush, but he now never existed.
Man, we are gonna get SO wasted!


See how much time welfare bums have on their hands. If you would only get a job and earn some money instead of cashing your Earned Income Tax Refund checks.
Might be interesting to see if your fucked up political opinion changes if you actually had to pay some income taxes like the rest of us.
Might be interesting to see if you did not receive direct government welfare checks every year.
I wonder how many Rock Pagers here, working now and paying income taxes, it takes to carry your worthless ass. That is not funny and not a silly game. Take some more food out off the tables of Rock Pagers assclown, see if they think it is a game.
Might be interesting to see if your fucked up political opinion changes if you actually had to pay some income taxes like the rest of us.
Might be interesting to see if you did not receive direct government welfare checks every year.
I wonder how many Rock Pagers here, working now and paying income taxes, it takes to carry your worthless ass. That is not funny and not a silly game. Take some more food out off the tables of Rock Pagers assclown, see if they think it is a game.
- lonewolf
- Diamond Member
- Posts: 6249
- Joined: Thursday Sep 25, 2003
- Location: Anywhere, Earth
- Contact:
That's a red herring. The extension of the "Bush tax cuts for the rich" amount to $81.5 billion over two years, or about $41 billion per year (rounded UP). That assumes incomes over $250,000 per year and a zero-sum income activity. It becomes a lot less if you move that to $1M and you allow for diminished income activity. Thats a far, far, far cry from the $1.28 trillion projected budget deficit for 2012.Hawk wrote:Exactly, if they let the taxes to the rich go back as they were scheduled to do by Bush, we would borrow less. The Republicans are for borrowing to cover these tax cuts but are against payroll tax cuts to the middle class. Hypocrites !f.sciarrillo wrote:They have to borrow money anyway you look at it, Bill. Where is the logic in that? We borrow .60 cents of every dollar. Where is the logic in that? We shouldn't have to be borrowing anything. I guess it is something the government seriously needs to work on. Then, if they wouldn't have passes the failed stimulus, things might be different.
I don't remember, did they borrow money to help pay for Obamacare as well? or is that all being paid for by raising taxes?
Put simply, it doesn't do jack shit for the deficit and I ROFLMAO everytime i see that simplistic but misleading populist rant.
http://money.cnn.com/2010/12/07/news/ec ... /index.htm
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/cbo-tr ... 2011-08-24
Changing the current tax code ain't nuthin' but pissing into the wind.
We need to dump the entire code and replace it with something new, simple and fair to everyone.
...Oh, the freedom of the day that yielded to no rule or time...
You see. Joe managed to follow all of the Rand cult rules in three sentences. While gleefully ignoring his allegiance to Ron Paul and Ron Paul's allegiance to white supremacists Don Black. He also followed the cult rule of exaggeration to the point of absurdity.undercoverjoe wrote:Bill supports fascist authoritarian government just like the Nazis did in Germany. This corrupt administration has already called the Tea Party terrorists and have their minions (union thugs) tell their cronies to wipe them out. Bill, will you help build the concentration camps, gas showers and ovens when the Kenyan fuhrer tells you to?Hawk wrote:I really don't know how you can call a capitalist a Marxist, other then you are required to by your anti - Christ god Ayn Rand.undercoverjoe wrote: Any different that a Marxist fascist like George Soros wants the illegal Kenyan to win? Terrorist groups like Hamas support the Kenyan. Bill supports Marxists and Middle East terrorists. Your logic is so twisted, but so is your soul.
Really, has Obama contributed to Hamas like Ron Paul has to Stormfront white supremacist Don Black? I knew Libertarians supported race discrimination. It's interesting to discover your leader is in bed with them.
Joe was told to call anyone a fascist who supports ANY law that intrudes on his hallowed sphere of individual autonomy.
Joe's typical answers based on his Randroid cult is to exaggerate my opinion to the point of absurdity and to call me a name like"fascist".
Soon you will all recognise Randriod speak.
Joe was told to call anyone a fascist who supports ANY law that intrudes on his hallowed sphere of individual autonomy.
So if you are against race discrimination you too are a fascist in Joe's Fantasy Land... Tell them Joe...
Joe, Does kissing Ayn Rand's ass get you any special brownie points (Or Does Don Black give out anti - brownie points) ? Seems like you're trying to rack 'em up. Just curious, do you have to report back to Ayn ?
-
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 942
- Joined: Tuesday Feb 22, 2005
- Location: Altoona,Pa