More bullshit from Obama.
Some facts on the debt, from CBS, not a conservative source.
The Federal Government’s flood of red ink hit another high-water mark as the Treasury Department quietly reported today that the National Debt hit $11-trillion for the first time ever.
To be exact, the Debt now stands at $11,033,157,578,669.78. Divide it by the U.S. population and it comes up to over $36,000 in debt for every man, woman and child among us.
And the government is running up mountains of debt with increasing speed. It took just over 5 ½ months for Uncle Sam to go another trillion dollars deeper in debt since hitting $10-trillion last September 30th. It’s the fastest jump in U.S. history.
The hundreds of billions of dollars being spent as part of the federal bailout of the financial markets is a leading factor in the rapid increase. Over $400-billion in debt has been accrued in the 57 days since President Obama took office.
And the federal budget he unveiled last month projects even faster increases in the National Debt. It’ll hit $12.7-trillion by the end of the fiscal year on September 30th. The Administration’s four year estimate shows that by the end of September 2012, the Debt will have soared to $16.2-trillion – which amounts to nearly 100% of the projected Gross Domestic Product that year.
The U.S. is running up so much debt so quickly, some investors are worried. Over the weekend, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao, who says his country has about a trillion dollars invested in U.S. Treasury notes, said he wanted a guarantee.
President Obama said Wen’s got nothing to worry about.
“Not just the Chinese government, but every investor, can have absolute confidence in the soundness of investments in the United States,” he said on Saturday.
That’s because the U.S. government’s power to tax stands behind all of its debt. If Uncle Sam ever needs a bailout, then as now, taxpayers get nailed.
It took the U.S. government 191 years – from 1791 until 1982 – to run up its first trillion dollars in debt. The second and third trillions got on the scoreboard much more quickly – each in just four years.
By the time George W. Bush was inaugurated in 2001, the National Debt stood at $5.7-trillion. He ran up more debt faster than nearly all of his predecessors combined: just under $4.9-trillion.
The National Debt stood at $10.6-trillon on the day Barack Obama took office. But if his budget projections are accurate, he’ll run up nearly as much government debt in four years as President Bush did in eight.
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/03/17 ... 2310.shtml
The Federal Government’s flood of red ink hit another high-water mark as the Treasury Department quietly reported today that the National Debt hit $11-trillion for the first time ever.
To be exact, the Debt now stands at $11,033,157,578,669.78. Divide it by the U.S. population and it comes up to over $36,000 in debt for every man, woman and child among us.
And the government is running up mountains of debt with increasing speed. It took just over 5 ½ months for Uncle Sam to go another trillion dollars deeper in debt since hitting $10-trillion last September 30th. It’s the fastest jump in U.S. history.
The hundreds of billions of dollars being spent as part of the federal bailout of the financial markets is a leading factor in the rapid increase. Over $400-billion in debt has been accrued in the 57 days since President Obama took office.
And the federal budget he unveiled last month projects even faster increases in the National Debt. It’ll hit $12.7-trillion by the end of the fiscal year on September 30th. The Administration’s four year estimate shows that by the end of September 2012, the Debt will have soared to $16.2-trillion – which amounts to nearly 100% of the projected Gross Domestic Product that year.
The U.S. is running up so much debt so quickly, some investors are worried. Over the weekend, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao, who says his country has about a trillion dollars invested in U.S. Treasury notes, said he wanted a guarantee.
President Obama said Wen’s got nothing to worry about.
“Not just the Chinese government, but every investor, can have absolute confidence in the soundness of investments in the United States,” he said on Saturday.
That’s because the U.S. government’s power to tax stands behind all of its debt. If Uncle Sam ever needs a bailout, then as now, taxpayers get nailed.
It took the U.S. government 191 years – from 1791 until 1982 – to run up its first trillion dollars in debt. The second and third trillions got on the scoreboard much more quickly – each in just four years.
By the time George W. Bush was inaugurated in 2001, the National Debt stood at $5.7-trillion. He ran up more debt faster than nearly all of his predecessors combined: just under $4.9-trillion.
The National Debt stood at $10.6-trillon on the day Barack Obama took office. But if his budget projections are accurate, he’ll run up nearly as much government debt in four years as President Bush did in eight.
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/03/17 ... 2310.shtml
You have been claiming for months that it went from 0 to 11 trillion under Obama . Now I prove you to be wrong AGAIN. That's my only point. Even when the facts are there you remain ignorant. And the point goes over your head. I guess there is no educating you. I am forced to give up again. Either you are incredibly stupid OR you are baiting me. I very sincerely would like to believe you are baiting me.f.sciarrillo wrote:You have no clue that it goes every year and your point is pointless ...Hawk wrote:I never said it didn't go up under Obama. I'm pointing out thatf.sciarrillo wrote: Where on there does it say that obama didn't raise it? You are looking at a one way river again. The stats clearly show the the debts goes up every year and so far Obama has it the highest it has ever been ...
YOU had no clue we had a deficit or 10 Trillion before Obama. Because Beck didn't tell you.
Last edited by Hawk on Wednesday Dec 09, 2009, edited 1 time in total.
Joe, we all know the debt is increasing. It picked up speed under W. My question for you (both singular "you" and plural "you") is why didn't you write these kind of posts when Reagan, Bush and especially when W took it to 10 trillion ?undercoverjoe wrote:Some facts on the debt, from CBS, not a conservative source.
The Federal Government’s flood of red ink hit another high-water mark as the Treasury Department quietly reported today that the National Debt hit $11-trillion for the first time ever.
To be exact, the Debt now stands at $11,033,157,578,669.78. Divide it by the U.S. population and it comes up to over $36,000 in debt for every man, woman and child among us.
And the government is running up mountains of debt with increasing speed. It took just over 5 ½ months for Uncle Sam to go another trillion dollars deeper in debt since hitting $10-trillion last September 30th. It’s the fastest jump in U.S. history.
The hundreds of billions of dollars being spent as part of the federal bailout of the financial markets is a leading factor in the rapid increase. Over $400-billion in debt has been accrued in the 57 days since President Obama took office.
And the federal budget he unveiled last month projects even faster increases in the National Debt. It’ll hit $12.7-trillion by the end of the fiscal year on September 30th. The Administration’s four year estimate shows that by the end of September 2012, the Debt will have soared to $16.2-trillion – which amounts to nearly 100% of the projected Gross Domestic Product that year.
The U.S. is running up so much debt so quickly, some investors are worried. Over the weekend, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao, who says his country has about a trillion dollars invested in U.S. Treasury notes, said he wanted a guarantee.
President Obama said Wen’s got nothing to worry about.
“Not just the Chinese government, but every investor, can have absolute confidence in the soundness of investments in the United States,” he said on Saturday.
That’s because the U.S. government’s power to tax stands behind all of its debt. If Uncle Sam ever needs a bailout, then as now, taxpayers get nailed.
It took the U.S. government 191 years – from 1791 until 1982 – to run up its first trillion dollars in debt. The second and third trillions got on the scoreboard much more quickly – each in just four years.
By the time George W. Bush was inaugurated in 2001, the National Debt stood at $5.7-trillion. He ran up more debt faster than nearly all of his predecessors combined: just under $4.9-trillion.
The National Debt stood at $10.6-trillon on the day Barack Obama took office. But if his budget projections are accurate, he’ll run up nearly as much government debt in four years as President Bush did in eight.
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/03/17 ... 2310.shtml
I'll tell you why. Because it wasn't in the media, especially not in the right wing media. The righ wing media kept their listeners ignorant to the fact as f proves every day.
- THEM BONES
- Gold Member
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Friday Mar 20, 2009
- Location: cloud 9
- Contact:
Hey
This thread should be called "More Bullshit from Rob" 

www.myspace.com/baddazerocks
www.myspace.com/officialstepton
"I feel so alone, gonna end up a
big ol' pile of them bones"
www.myspace.com/officialstepton
"I feel so alone, gonna end up a
big ol' pile of them bones"
- DirtySanchez
- Diamond Member
- Posts: 4186
- Joined: Tuesday Feb 14, 2006
- Location: On teh internetz
- Contact:
Re: Hey
/threadTHEM BONES wrote:This thread should be called "More Bullshit from Rob"
"You are now either a clueless inbred brownshirt Teabagger, or a babykilling hippie Marxist on welfare."-Songsmith
- RobTheDrummer
- Diamond Member
- Posts: 5227
- Joined: Tuesday Dec 10, 2002
- Location: Tiptonia, Pa
Re: Hey
+1THEM BONES wrote:This thread should be called "More Bullshit from Rob"
-
- Diamond Member
- Posts: 6990
- Joined: Thursday Oct 28, 2004
- Location: Not here ..
Abortions happen in all walks of life from rich to poor.f.sciarrillo wrote:I am going to add to it here. The amendment to remove government funded abortions from the health bill was shot down. It makes me feel so good knowing that I am going to be paying the bill for the trailer trash sluts who can't keep their legs shut
Frank, Should every woman who has an abortion (murder) be put to death ?
edited for proper noun
Last edited by Hawk on Thursday Dec 10, 2009, edited 1 time in total.
- Mapex Drummer
- Active Member
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Thursday Jun 21, 2007
- Location: Burlington, WV
- Contact:
Did you guys know that Santa is comming? Or did Obama get to him too? 

I maybe in my own little world, but It's ok they know me here.
http://www.myspace.com/wv_drummer
http://www.myspace.com/wv_drummer
-
- Diamond Member
- Posts: 6990
- Joined: Thursday Oct 28, 2004
- Location: Not here ..
Bill, please, it is FrankHawk wrote:Abortions happen in all walks of life from rich to poor.f.sciarrillo wrote:I am going to add to it here. The amendment to remove government funded abortions from the health bill was shot down. It makes me feel so good knowing that I am going to be paying the bill for the trailer trash sluts who can't keep their legs shut
f, Should every woman who has an abortion (murder) be put to death ?

As for abortion. The only time it should be accepted is in the case of Rape or Incest - In the case of said; it should be a proven act first. Just having it to have it should be considered murder and it is something that my tax money should not be paying for period ..
You avoided answering the question.f.sciarrillo wrote:Bill, please, it is FrankHawk wrote:Abortions happen in all walks of life from rich to poor.f.sciarrillo wrote:I am going to add to it here. The amendment to remove government funded abortions from the health bill was shot down. It makes me feel so good knowing that I am going to be paying the bill for the trailer trash sluts who can't keep their legs shut
Frank, Should every woman who has an abortion (murder) be put to death ?
As for abortion. The only time it should be accepted is in the case of Rape or Incest - In the case of said; it should be a proven act first. Just having it to have it should be considered murder and it is something that my tax money should not be paying for period ..
What should the punishment be for a woman who murders her unborn child ? Death, life imprisonmant ? You tell me.
-
- Diamond Member
- Posts: 6990
- Joined: Thursday Oct 28, 2004
- Location: Not here ..
If you look at my post I said it should be considered murder. So the punishment for the crime should be what the jury says. I agree with what they give her; whether it be death or life in prison ..Hawk wrote:You avoided answering the question.f.sciarrillo wrote:Bill, please, it is FrankHawk wrote: Abortions happen in all walks of life from rich to poor.
Frank, Should every woman who has an abortion (murder) be put to death ?
As for abortion. The only time it should be accepted is in the case of Rape or Incest - In the case of said; it should be a proven act first. Just having it to have it should be considered murder and it is something that my tax money should not be paying for period ..
What should the punishment be for a woman who murders her unborn child ? Death, life imprisonmant ? You tell me.
- RobTheDrummer
- Diamond Member
- Posts: 5227
- Joined: Tuesday Dec 10, 2002
- Location: Tiptonia, Pa
So you want to send them to the state prisons, that are paid for by your state taxes. So how are you winning by this?f.sciarrillo wrote:If you look at my post I said it should be considered murder. So the punishment for the crime should be what the jury says. I agree with what they give her; whether it be death or life in prison ..Hawk wrote:You avoided answering the question.f.sciarrillo wrote: Bill, please, it is Frank
As for abortion. The only time it should be accepted is in the case of Rape or Incest - In the case of said; it should be a proven act first. Just having it to have it should be considered murder and it is something that my tax money should not be paying for period ..
What should the punishment be for a woman who murders her unborn child ? Death, life imprisonmant ? You tell me.
The script was written, and the villian was cast. The provocation needed, they will provide. They did it before, they'll do it again.
- RobTheDrummer
- Diamond Member
- Posts: 5227
- Joined: Tuesday Dec 10, 2002
- Location: Tiptonia, Pa
I just think people should be held accountable for their actions. Where is the responsibility? If you want an abortion, pay for it. Why should it be my responsibility to pay for your mistakes? Why should I already have to pay for some slut to have 5 kids and be on welfare? All this big government bullshit does is take responsibility away from careless people.
-
- Diamond Member
- Posts: 6990
- Joined: Thursday Oct 28, 2004
- Location: Not here ..
+1RobTheDrummer wrote:I just think people should be held accountable for their actions. Where is the responsibility? If you want an abortion, pay for it. Why should it be my responsibility to pay for your mistakes? Why should I already have to pay for some slut to have 5 kids and be on welfare? All this big government bullshit does is take responsibility away from careless people.
-
- Diamond Member
- Posts: 6990
- Joined: Thursday Oct 28, 2004
- Location: Not here ..
If you saw the law change to charging the people who have them without a good cause with murder, you would see the rate go down ..Flaw wrote:So you want to send them to the state prisons, that are paid for by your state taxes. So how are you winning by this?f.sciarrillo wrote:If you look at my post I said it should be considered murder. So the punishment for the crime should be what the jury says. I agree with what they give her; whether it be death or life in prison ..Hawk wrote: You avoided answering the question.
What should the punishment be for a woman who murders her unborn child ? Death, life imprisonmant ? You tell me.
- bassist_25
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6815
- Joined: Monday Dec 09, 2002
- Location: Indiana
Did you have health care when you were playing full-time in Reno? What would you have done if you came down with a serious illness?RobTheDrummer wrote:I suppose I should pay for other people's health care, that must be the American Dream that our forefathers talked about.
"He's the electric horseman, you better back off!" - old sKool making a reference to the culturally relevant 1979 film.
- bassist_25
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6815
- Joined: Monday Dec 09, 2002
- Location: Indiana
And you have empirical evidence for that?f.sciarrillo wrote: If you saw the law change to charging the people who have them without a good cause with murder, you would see the rate go down ..
P.s. For the record, I'm pro-life.
"He's the electric horseman, you better back off!" - old sKool making a reference to the culturally relevant 1979 film.
- bassist_25
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6815
- Joined: Monday Dec 09, 2002
- Location: Indiana
You do. You pay insurance companies, and hospitals, to cover the cost of people who use the ER for doctor visits. You have for years. Both the insurance companies and hospitals tack on the cost and add a little (or a lot) extra for their trouble. That's the American Dream.--->JMSRobTheDrummer wrote:I suppose I should pay for other people's health care,
songsmith wrote:You do. You pay insurance companies, and hospitals, to cover the cost of people who use the ER for doctor visits. You have for years. Both the insurance companies and hospitals tack on the cost and add a little (or a lot) extra for their trouble.RobTheDrummer wrote:I suppose I should pay for other people's health care,
You also pay for all the people on Medicaid and Medicare.
- lonewolf
- Diamond Member
- Posts: 6249
- Joined: Thursday Sep 25, 2003
- Location: Anywhere, Earth
- Contact:
Don't they have internet where you are going?bassist_25 wrote:Not to be Hawk and post three times in a row in political thread, but I'm going to miss these circular political peeing matches when I bounce.
Oh, and you thought you spent too much on equipment when you were a poor college student...wait until you start getting that fat paycheck. Better get an apartment with at least one extra room.
(oh and btw, congrats & good luck with the new gig)
...Oh, the freedom of the day that yielded to no rule or time...