


He did and when he found out, he reported it, along with the witness to the AD, as is his duty.RobTheDrummer wrote:Try and tell me that Joe didn't know about it.....
Thats my point...why I think Spanier is the one (besides Sandusky obviously) who should be accountable. The buck stopped there.Also...Suppose that at your job, somebody came up to you and reported that they saw one of your colleagues doing something like Sandusky was accused with. What would you do? If it were me, I'd go to my supervisor and request a closed-door meeting to report what I had been told. The supervisor would then determine the next course of action. But I wouldn't feel free to then go ahead and contact the police myself, especially if my supervisor told me he/she would take that step, and also if all I had to go on was the heresay of somebody who told me they saw something.
Well put JP.Jim Price wrote:The JoePa part of the discussion is where I'm having some problems...I guess what I need to know is what McQueary actually told him about the incident he witnessed, and then what Tim Curley told Joe when Joe reported the incident to him. If Curley assured Joe that he would take action, and kept assuring Joe in subsequent weeks and months that he was taking action, Joe might not have sensed any reason to pursue the matter further on his end. If Curley was telling Joe he was handling it, Joe may have had no reason to believe he had to do anything else.
Also...Suppose that at your job, somebody came up to you and reported that they saw one of your colleagues doing something like Sandusky was accused with. What would you do? If it were me, I'd go to my supervisor and request a closed-door meeting to report what I had been told. The supervisor would then determine the next course of action. But I wouldn't feel free to then go ahead and contact the police myself, especially if my supervisor told me he/she would take that step, and also if all I had to go on was the heresay of somebody who told me they saw something.
Joe might have viewed Mike McQueary as a trustworthy person and believed him when he reported the incident, but it was still heresay at that point - Joe is trusting the word of what somebody else said they saw - what if Joe went ahead and contacted the police, brought out these allegations against Sandusky based on heresay, and they turned out to be false? He would potentially open the university and himself to libel lawsuits and litigation.
Hindsight is 20/20, and everybody is yelling that Joe should have done something more. Maybe he should have...But I can't jump on the anti-JoePa bandwagon without knowing exactly what he knew and what he was told. Hopefully that will all be revealed as this story continues to develop.
Ray Gricar decided not to press charges in what,1998? It could have been stopped right then and there if he would have went through with it. But yea,let's blame Paterno,he's an easy targetundercoverjoe wrote:Neither did those kids who were anally penetrated. How many more rapes of young boys could Joepa have stopped if he took more action 9 years ago?
Well Joe Pa has huge power in Happy Valley. Mike McCreary, a grad assistant 9 years ago did NOT have power. Joe Pa is now saying McCreary lied.onegunguitar wrote:Ray Gricar decided not to press charges in what,1998? It could have been stopped right then and there if he would have went through with it. But yea,let's blame Paterno,he's an easy targetundercoverjoe wrote:Neither did those kids who were anally penetrated. How many more rapes of young boys could Joepa have stopped if he took more action 9 years ago?![]()
McCreary should have dialed 911 the minute he saw the crime. The University Police are only a few blocks away.autumnsky wrote:If you witnessed something that criminal, especially with a child involved, why would you even want to "discuss" it with any one. Wouldn't you just go to the authorities so that you would be sure that some one would be aware of what was going on? How many of these things happen "behind closed doors" because of the people involved? Makes ya wonder. Also, did any one else wonder about the possible Ray Gricar (spelling?) disappearance and the connection with him becoming aware of the whole Sandusky thing around the same time? Hmmmmm. Would make for a great "made for tv" movie!!!
McCreary should have called 911 immediately. Instead, he waited a day to tell Paterno. At that point it became a non-emergency crime and protocol at Penn State for reporting a non-emergency crime is to notify the department head--the department head IS "the authorities". I know this because I worked there for 7 years and had to report stolen equipment in this manner. I found this out the hard way with the first incident when I called campus police on my own and got my ass reamed out for not going to the department head.RobTheDrummer wrote:McCreary and Joe shouldn't have just passed it on, they should have confronted Sandusky and went straight to the authorities. There is a moral obligation from all parties that was grossly neglected, and as a result, Sandusky was still permitted in the facilities, and as a member of the University, for years after. It really sickens me, that you could see this and just pass it along and shrug it off. What if this were your child?
RobTheDrummer wrote:Were you there?
That's my question, people can speculate or say all kinds of things about what happened, but if you weren't there, then you just can't say. I know this because I work in the "law enforcement" field, and see this stuff happen everyday. People will turn things into something else, and I see it with my own eyes and know they are completely off. Anyway, my point is, unless you were there, shut yer yap.