I would recognize its right to exist. That doesn't mean that I'd support its existance. You can take care of that if you like, Johnny.songsmith wrote:A majority still decides elections, and a majority decided to forego conservatism in 2006, and 2008. The minority then decided that the best thing for America in the Bush-recession was to not pay for what they had bought, and become suddenly thrifty, as I had predicted. At this point in the Obama administration, the right has done nothing to help anyone except tax breaks for the upper-class, which they held the middle-class financially responsible for. There is still no viable GOP jobs plan, their "fix" for SocSec and Medicare is to destroy both or turn them over to corporate rule, Wall St. continues to earn record profits raping the American economy, speculators are hyperinflating the price of everything from gasoline to rice thanks to deregulation, and corporations now have the same (or more) rights as citizens without any of the responsibility (like taxes).lonewolf wrote:You mean like a majority of voters voting to establish a national church.songsmith wrote:[We can't have a majority of voters running things can we? That kills liberty! LOL
Guns are dangerous, so the majority can outlaw guns?
Since the majority has deemed certain private goods & services to be good for all, they decide to make a law that requires you to buy these goods & services from an approved private vendor as a matter of citizenship. Failure to comply will result in penalties prescribed by law.
The majority decides to make a law that allows total strangers access to your home if they are in the military. While they are at it, they can just eliminate those pesky warrants...judges give them out like after dinner mints anyway, so who will mind?
The majority recognizes that a grand jury takes too long in capital cases. They decide to just skip that part and make a law to eliminate them...hell, all juries take too much time...they may as well eliminate all of them.
I hope these ridiculous notions help to illustrate the concept of mob rule and that the United States is NOT a democracy, it is a republic and was specifically conceived as a republic to prevent mob rule and tyranny by the majority.
This is because people are 98% animal and 2% human and they had to find a way to protect us from the human part.
This would have worked too, had a few socialists not found vulnerabilities in the Constitution and managed to exploit them through extortion. At that point, they may as well have just thrown the Constitution into the fire.
You are correct that we live in a representative republic. We elected a president with a majority, to represent us. Delegitimizing that representative delegitimizes that majority. Any power you deny that president, you deny the majority, against their will. Now, tell me, why did the minority form a Tea Party? To undermine the representative elected by the majority. If, by some miracle or dirty trick, the GOP takes the presidency in 2012, will you support the existence of a left-wing extremist group bent upon the removal of the then-president?
It sounds like you are very disappointed in the current administration with all that bad stuff happening under their watch.
EDIT: There already is a left-wing extremist group that would be bent upon the removal of an opposition president. Its called the Democratic Party.