Bullshit!

Moderators: Ron, Jim Price

Post Reply
jetcitywoman
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Posts: 555
Joined: Wednesday Oct 05, 2011

Post by jetcitywoman »

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1039 ... s-head-man

He must get along with Peyton! Peyton is the Colts!
jetcitywoman
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Posts: 555
Joined: Wednesday Oct 05, 2011

Post by jetcitywoman »

jetcitywoman
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Posts: 555
Joined: Wednesday Oct 05, 2011

Post by jetcitywoman »

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1052 ... ks/page/36

Big Ben weighs in at #4 out of top 50 Qbacks, Flacco way to the back @ #15!

8)
User avatar
sstuckey
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 485
Joined: Friday Dec 04, 2009
Location: Altoona

Post by sstuckey »

jetcitywoman wrote:http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1052 ... ks/page/36

Big Ben weighs in at #4 out of top 50 Qbacks, Flacco way to the back @ #15!

8)
And yet the Ravens managed to beat you both times. And also managed to advance further in the playoffs. Some decade you will realize football is a team sport. It takes 53 players to win a championship....not one.
f.sciarrillo
Diamond Member
Diamond Member
Posts: 6990
Joined: Thursday Oct 28, 2004
Location: Not here ..

Post by f.sciarrillo »

sstuckey wrote:
jetcitywoman wrote:http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1052 ... ks/page/36

Big Ben weighs in at #4 out of top 50 Qbacks, Flacco way to the back @ #15!

8)
And yet the Ravens managed to beat you both times. And also managed to advance further in the playoffs. Some decade you will realize football is a team sport. It takes 53 players to win a championship....not one.
Maybe in that time she will also learn that there are more reputible sources, like ESPN for example. I don't think Jet knows what ESPN is. :lol:
Music Rocks!
User avatar
sstuckey
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 485
Joined: Friday Dec 04, 2009
Location: Altoona

Post by sstuckey »

f.sciarrillo wrote:
sstuckey wrote:
jetcitywoman wrote:http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1052 ... ks/page/36

Big Ben weighs in at #4 out of top 50 Qbacks, Flacco way to the back @ #15!

8)
And yet the Ravens managed to beat you both times. And also managed to advance further in the playoffs. Some decade you will realize football is a team sport. It takes 53 players to win a championship....not one.
Maybe in that time she will also learn that there are more reputible sources, like ESPN for example. I don't think Jet knows what ESPN is. :lol:
ESPN...That's the Extra Sensory Perception Network. That's where all those awesome predictions came from. Ya know like Green Bay vs Pittsburgh in the Superbowl for instance.
f.sciarrillo
Diamond Member
Diamond Member
Posts: 6990
Joined: Thursday Oct 28, 2004
Location: Not here ..

Post by f.sciarrillo »

sstuckey wrote:
f.sciarrillo wrote:
sstuckey wrote: And yet the Ravens managed to beat you both times. And also managed to advance further in the playoffs. Some decade you will realize football is a team sport. It takes 53 players to win a championship....not one.
Maybe in that time she will also learn that there are more reputible sources, like ESPN for example. I don't think Jet knows what ESPN is. :lol:
ESPN...That's the Extra Sensory Perception Network. That's where all those awesome predictions came from. Ya know like Green Bay vs Pittsburgh in the Superbowl for instance.
That could very well be what it is. :lol:
Music Rocks!
jetcitywoman
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Posts: 555
Joined: Wednesday Oct 05, 2011

Post by jetcitywoman »

sstuckey wrote:
jetcitywoman wrote:http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1052 ... ks/page/36

Big Ben weighs in at #4 out of top 50 Qbacks, Flacco way to the back @ #15!

8)
And yet the Ravens managed to beat you both times. And also managed to advance further in the playoffs. Some decade you will realize football is a team sport. It takes 53 players to win a championship....not one.
Football is a team sport..what insight!

Never stated nor suggested or implied it isn't anything but a team sport.

The point of the ratings, my point is that Flacco isn't very good. The Ravens didn't lose playoff's because of anything Flacco did per se, but because of what he DIDN'T DO. He didn't STEP UP & LEAD, he was just another mediocre "back" in backfield. Qbacks should be teamleaders.

And with the Ravens relying more and more on RICE, Flacco's stats will degrade even further. haahahahhhaha. gotta love it.
User avatar
sstuckey
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 485
Joined: Friday Dec 04, 2009
Location: Altoona

Post by sstuckey »

jetcitywoman wrote:
sstuckey wrote:
jetcitywoman wrote:http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1052 ... ks/page/36

Big Ben weighs in at #4 out of top 50 Qbacks, Flacco way to the back @ #15!

8)
And yet the Ravens managed to beat you both times. And also managed to advance further in the playoffs. Some decade you will realize football is a team sport. It takes 53 players to win a championship....not one.
Football is a team sport..what insight!

Never stated nor suggested or implied it isn't anything but a team sport.

The point of the ratings, my point is that Flacco isn't very good. The Ravens didn't lose playoff's because of anything Flacco did per se, but because of what he DIDN'T DO. He didn't STEP UP & LEAD, he was just another mediocre "back" in backfield. Qbacks should be teamleaders.

And with the Ravens relying more and more on RICE, Flacco's stats will degrade even further. haahahahhhaha. gotta love it.


And yet another example of Jet typing first...thinking later.....or not thinking at all for that matter. Do you watch the same games I do? I don't think so because if you did you would probably remember Flacco LEADING his team down the field on the final drive vs. New England. Lee Evans dropped the game-winning catch in the endzone. And the kicker missed the field goal that would have sent the game into overtime. He lead his team down the field on the final drive and his receiver and kicker let him down.

I also would like to point out Flacco has MORE passing attempts than Big Ben. Also he threw it 251 more times than Ray Rice ran it.

Now let's take a look at their performances in the 2012 playoffs.

Worthlessberger -
22/40
289 Yds
1 TD
1 INT
75.93 QB RATING
0-1

Flacco -
36/63
482 YDS
4 TD
1 INT
96.31 QB RATING
1-1

Who lead who?
User avatar
shredder138
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Posts: 561
Joined: Monday Jun 02, 2008
Location: Where you're not

Post by shredder138 »

sstuckey wrote: Worthlessberger -

:lol: I loled!
____________
f.sciarrillo
Diamond Member
Diamond Member
Posts: 6990
Joined: Thursday Oct 28, 2004
Location: Not here ..

Post by f.sciarrillo »

In Rothlesbergers defense, he was hurt pretty much the whole season. But they still sucked. I am surprised they made as far as they did.
Music Rocks!
User avatar
sstuckey
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 485
Joined: Friday Dec 04, 2009
Location: Altoona

Post by sstuckey »

f.sciarrillo wrote:In Rothlesbergers defense, he was hurt pretty much the whole season. But they still sucked. I am surprised they made as far as they did.
Okay I am sorry to do this to ya Frank, but I have heard that excuse too much. If his injuries lead to his poor performance then he isn't being the leader Jet labels him as. He therefore becomes a liability, and possibly the reason they got the early exit, with a one and done. If you are too hurt to be effective, you are costing your team a chance to advance....that's NOT being a leader. Do not confuse toughness, with being stubborn.
f.sciarrillo
Diamond Member
Diamond Member
Posts: 6990
Joined: Thursday Oct 28, 2004
Location: Not here ..

Post by f.sciarrillo »

Believe me, there were plenty of games where I thought he was a liability and started screaming at the tv to take him out and put Batch in. I feel if they would have took Ben out and put Batch in, they would have done better. So, yes, he was a liability.
Music Rocks!
jetcitywoman
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Posts: 555
Joined: Wednesday Oct 05, 2011

Post by jetcitywoman »

sstuckey wrote:
f.sciarrillo wrote:In Rothlesbergers defense, he was hurt pretty much the whole season. But they still sucked. I am surprised they made as far as they did.
Okay I am sorry to do this to ya Frank, but I have heard that excuse too much. If his injuries lead to his poor performance then he isn't being the leader Jet labels him as. He therefore becomes a liability, and possibly the reason they got the early exit, with a one and done. If you are too hurt to be effective, you are costing your team a chance to advance....that's NOT being a leader. Do not confuse toughness, with being stubborn.
Excuse? An excuse is when you make up or exaggerate something to justify lack of performance. A FACT is an injured Qback so hobbled that his performance was obviously and significantly negatively impacted.

That's a FACT, not an excuse.

As for Flacco, he has neither and injury nor a good excuse for his poor performance all season.

Big Ben is both tough and stubborn, and those are qualities of a great field leader.
User avatar
sstuckey
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 485
Joined: Friday Dec 04, 2009
Location: Altoona

Post by sstuckey »

jetcitywoman wrote:
sstuckey wrote:
f.sciarrillo wrote:In Rothlesbergers defense, he was hurt pretty much the whole season. But they still sucked. I am surprised they made as far as they did.
Okay I am sorry to do this to ya Frank, but I have heard that excuse too much. If his injuries lead to his poor performance then he isn't being the leader Jet labels him as. He therefore becomes a liability, and possibly the reason they got the early exit, with a one and done. If you are too hurt to be effective, you are costing your team a chance to advance....that's NOT being a leader. Do not confuse toughness, with being stubborn.
Excuse? An excuse is when you make up or exaggerate something to justify lack of performance. A FACT is an injured Qback so hobbled that his performance was obviously and significantly negatively impacted.

That's a FACT, not an excuse.

As for Flacco, he has neither and injury nor a good excuse for his poor performance all season.
The point was "since you missed it YET AGAIN" the guy was too hurt to win yet cost his team by being in there. A LEADER would have said "okay as badly as I want to play in this game the truth is I am ineffective and you should probably let someone else play." You call him a leader for costing his team with his inability to perform. Those are your EXACT words....an injured Qback so hobbled that his performance was obviously and significantly negatively impacted.

Big Ben had 21 TDs and 14 Int in the regular season....Flacco had 20 TDs and 12 Int. So either Ben sucked just as bad as Flacco....or Flacco was just as good as Ben. With numbers THAT similar your argument is running out of steam. How can they both post VERY similar stats and one be a god....and the other bum? Jet face the facts......either Ben isn't as good as you make him out to be.....or Flacco is better than you make him out to be.
jetcitywoman
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Posts: 555
Joined: Wednesday Oct 05, 2011

Post by jetcitywoman »

sstuckey wrote:
jetcitywoman wrote:
sstuckey wrote: Okay I am sorry to do this to ya Frank, but I have heard that excuse too much. If his injuries lead to his poor performance then he isn't being the leader Jet labels him as. He therefore becomes a liability, and possibly the reason they got the early exit, with a one and done. If you are too hurt to be effective, you are costing your team a chance to advance....that's NOT being a leader. Do not confuse toughness, with being stubborn.
Excuse? An excuse is when you make up or exaggerate something to justify lack of performance. A FACT is an injured Qback so hobbled that his performance was obviously and significantly negatively impacted.

That's a FACT, not an excuse.

As for Flacco, he has neither and injury nor a good excuse for his poor performance all season.
The point was "since you missed it YET AGAIN" the guy was too hurt to win yet cost his team by being in there. A LEADER would have said "okay as badly as I want to play in this game the truth is I am ineffective and you should probably let someone else play." You call him a leader for costing his team with his inability to perform. Those are your EXACT words....an injured Qback so hobbled that his performance was obviously and significantly negatively impacted.

Big Ben had 21 TDs and 14 Int in the regular season....Flacco had 20 TDs and 12 Int. So either Ben sucked just as bad as Flacco....or Flacco was just as good as Ben. With numbers THAT similar your argument is running out of steam. How can they both post VERY similar stats and one be a god....and the other bum? Jet face the facts......either Ben isn't as good as you make him out to be.....or Flacco is better than you make him out to be.
You can't know your too hurt to play till you get in there and try. If it proves out that he CAN play then he knows that he's the best chance for his team to win. He's only thinking of his team, and he risked further injury and even his career placing his teammates and the Steeler org first. I give him huge props for that!

Your hindsight is a perfect 20/20 as usual. :roll:
User avatar
sstuckey
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 485
Joined: Friday Dec 04, 2009
Location: Altoona

Post by sstuckey »

jetcitywoman wrote:
sstuckey wrote:
jetcitywoman wrote: Excuse? An excuse is when you make up or exaggerate something to justify lack of performance. A FACT is an injured Qback so hobbled that his performance was obviously and significantly negatively impacted.

That's a FACT, not an excuse.

As for Flacco, he has neither and injury nor a good excuse for his poor performance all season.
The point was "since you missed it YET AGAIN" the guy was too hurt to win yet cost his team by being in there. A LEADER would have said "okay as badly as I want to play in this game the truth is I am ineffective and you should probably let someone else play." You call him a leader for costing his team with his inability to perform. Those are your EXACT words....an injured Qback so hobbled that his performance was obviously and significantly negatively impacted.

Big Ben had 21 TDs and 14 Int in the regular season....Flacco had 20 TDs and 12 Int. So either Ben sucked just as bad as Flacco....or Flacco was just as good as Ben. With numbers THAT similar your argument is running out of steam. How can they both post VERY similar stats and one be a god....and the other bum? Jet face the facts......either Ben isn't as good as you make him out to be.....or Flacco is better than you make him out to be.
You can't know your too hurt to play till you get in there and try. If it proves out that he CAN play then he knows that he's the best chance for his team to win. He's only thinking of his team, and he risked further injury and even his career placing his teammates and the Steeler org first. I give him huge props for that!

Your hindsight is a perfect 20/20 as usual. :roll:
I am STILL waiting for your explanation how, two QB's with identical stats can be polar opposites? How can one be a hero...a god...can do no wrong....and the other is ineffective, and useless and a bum? Would you PLEASE explain to me how that works? Like it or not Flacco's numbers are VERY similar to Big Ben's. Yet you say Flacco sucks....and Ben rules. Even after Flacco and co. beat you both times.....AND....go further into the playoffs than your BELOVED Steelers. C'mon Jet let's hear you talk your way out of this one. Worthlessberger has 21 TD's and 14 INT's....Flacco has 20 TD's and 12 INT's. Why is Ben a superior QB to Flacco? I see nothing in those numbers that proves you to be right.
jetcitywoman
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Posts: 555
Joined: Wednesday Oct 05, 2011

Post by jetcitywoman »

sstuckey wrote:
jetcitywoman wrote:
sstuckey wrote: The point was "since you missed it YET AGAIN" the guy was too hurt to win yet cost his team by being in there. A LEADER would have said "okay as badly as I want to play in this game the truth is I am ineffective and you should probably let someone else play." You call him a leader for costing his team with his inability to perform. Those are your EXACT words....an injured Qback so hobbled that his performance was obviously and significantly negatively impacted.

Big Ben had 21 TDs and 14 Int in the regular season....Flacco had 20 TDs and 12 Int. So either Ben sucked just as bad as Flacco....or Flacco was just as good as Ben. With numbers THAT similar your argument is running out of steam. How can they both post VERY similar stats and one be a god....and the other bum? Jet face the facts......either Ben isn't as good as you make him out to be.....or Flacco is better than you make him out to be.
You can't know your too hurt to play till you get in there and try. If it proves out that he CAN play then he knows that he's the best chance for his team to win. He's only thinking of his team, and he risked further injury and even his career placing his teammates and the Steeler org first. I give him huge props for that!

Your hindsight is a perfect 20/20 as usual. :roll:
I am STILL waiting for your explanation how, two QB's with identical stats can be polar opposites? How can one be a hero...a god...can do no wrong....and the other is ineffective, and useless and a bum? Would you PLEASE explain to me how that works? Like it or not Flacco's numbers are VERY similar to Big Ben's. Yet you say Flacco sucks....and Ben rules. Even after Flacco and co. beat you both times.....AND....go further into the playoffs than your BELOVED Steelers. C'mon Jet let's hear you talk your way out of this one. Worthlessberger has 21 TD's and 14 INT's....Flacco has 20 TD's and 12 INT's. Why is Ben a superior QB to Flacco? I see nothing in those numbers that proves you to be right.
Maybe the answer is right here..

Expected to take the next step up the quarterback hierarchy in 2011, Flacco didn't progress as expected. Baltimore went to a passing-based offense more often, but the results haven't been ideal. There is talent here, but Flacco's decision making has to improve.


Big Ben #4..

As the Peyton Mannings of the league drop off, Roethlisberger is one of the quarterbacks ready to step into his place. A proven winner and productive passer, he is just starting to come into his own as a pure passer.

from the http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1052 ... ks/page/48

they go on to say (about Big Ben):
A Super Bowl winner and proven player in big moments, he has earned his stripes as a clutch quarterback

did you get that? they equate Big Ben with PEYTON MANNING!!!


they rate ONLY brees, brady and rodgers above Big Ben..

however, they rate jay cutler, alex smith and CAM NEWTON above Flaccid err Flacco.

enough said 8)
User avatar
sstuckey
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 485
Joined: Friday Dec 04, 2009
Location: Altoona

Post by sstuckey »

jetcitywoman wrote:
sstuckey wrote:
jetcitywoman wrote: You can't know your too hurt to play till you get in there and try. If it proves out that he CAN play then he knows that he's the best chance for his team to win. He's only thinking of his team, and he risked further injury and even his career placing his teammates and the Steeler org first. I give him huge props for that!

Your hindsight is a perfect 20/20 as usual. :roll:
I am STILL waiting for your explanation how, two QB's with identical stats can be polar opposites? How can one be a hero...a god...can do no wrong....and the other is ineffective, and useless and a bum? Would you PLEASE explain to me how that works? Like it or not Flacco's numbers are VERY similar to Big Ben's. Yet you say Flacco sucks....and Ben rules. Even after Flacco and co. beat you both times.....AND....go further into the playoffs than your BELOVED Steelers. C'mon Jet let's hear you talk your way out of this one. Worthlessberger has 21 TD's and 14 INT's....Flacco has 20 TD's and 12 INT's. Why is Ben a superior QB to Flacco? I see nothing in those numbers that proves you to be right.
Maybe the answer is right here..

Expected to take the next step up the quarterback hierarchy in 2011, Flacco didn't progress as expected. Baltimore went to a passing-based offense more often, but the results haven't been ideal. There is talent here, but Flacco's decision making has to improve.


Big Ben #4..

As the Peyton Mannings of the league drop off, Roethlisberger is one of the quarterbacks ready to step into his place. A proven winner and productive passer, he is just starting to come into his own as a pure passer.

from the http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1052 ... ks/page/48

they go on to say (about Big Ben):
A Super Bowl winner and proven player in big moments, he has earned his stripes as a clutch quarterback

did you get that? they equate Big Ben with PEYTON MANNING!!!


they raye ONLY brees, brady and rodgers above Big Ben..

however, they rate jay cutler, alex smith and CAM NEWTON above Flaccid err Flacco.

enough said 8)
Look at the fuckin STATS!!!! I don't care what your 'bottom of the birdcage gazette' has to say. I want to hear you back it up with something solid such as STATISTICS!! Don't regurgitate what some ass clown from a website posts. Incidentally take a look at the post season predictions from your horse's ass of a website. The guy didn't even get 50% of them right!!
In fact that very website predicted Pittsburgh vs Green Bay in the Superbowl....and neither team won a single playoff game....EXCELLENT SOURCE!!!!

Let me also remind you one of those Superbowl wins was in SPITE of Ben not because of him. How quickly you have forgotten how incredibly shitty he played against Seattle. In fact so shitty that he has the worst quarterback rating for a Superbowl winner. THOSE ARE FACTS. You argue using opinions I debate using actual numbers to back up my statements. That's the difference between us...well that and the fact that my football knowledge vastly outweighs yours.
f.sciarrillo
Diamond Member
Diamond Member
Posts: 6990
Joined: Thursday Oct 28, 2004
Location: Not here ..

Post by f.sciarrillo »

jetcitywoman wrote:
Maybe the answer is right here..

Expected to take the next step up the quarterback hierarchy in 2011, Flacco didn't progress as expected. Baltimore went to a passing-based offense more often, but the results haven't been ideal. There is talent here, but Flacco's decision making has to improve.


Big Ben #4..

As the Peyton Mannings of the league drop off, Roethlisberger is one of the quarterbacks ready to step into his place. A proven winner and productive passer, he is just starting to come into his own as a pure passer.

from the http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1052 ... ks/page/48

they go on to say (about Big Ben):
A Super Bowl winner and proven player in big moments, he has earned his stripes as a clutch quarterback

did you get that? they equate Big Ben with PEYTON MANNING!!!


they rate ONLY brees, brady and rodgers above Big Ben..

however, they rate jay cutler, alex smith and CAM NEWTON above Flaccid err Flacco.

enough said 8)
Hey, Look, more info from Bleacher report. Now I know Jet is dating the person who runs it.
Music Rocks!
User avatar
sstuckey
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 485
Joined: Friday Dec 04, 2009
Location: Altoona

Post by sstuckey »

f.sciarrillo wrote:
jetcitywoman wrote:
Maybe the answer is right here..

Expected to take the next step up the quarterback hierarchy in 2011, Flacco didn't progress as expected. Baltimore went to a passing-based offense more often, but the results haven't been ideal. There is talent here, but Flacco's decision making has to improve.


Big Ben #4..

As the Peyton Mannings of the league drop off, Roethlisberger is one of the quarterbacks ready to step into his place. A proven winner and productive passer, he is just starting to come into his own as a pure passer.

from the http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1052 ... ks/page/48

they go on to say (about Big Ben):
A Super Bowl winner and proven player in big moments, he has earned his stripes as a clutch quarterback

did you get that? they equate Big Ben with PEYTON MANNING!!!


they rate ONLY brees, brady and rodgers above Big Ben..

however, they rate jay cutler, alex smith and CAM NEWTON above Flaccid err Flacco.

enough said 8)
Hey, Look, more info from Bleacher report. Now I know Jet is dating the person who runs it.
Prior to Jet I never even heard of this website. I don't know who writes for it but I'd rather listen to ESPN and NFL.com and NFL Network. Not that it takes a website, or a rocket scientist to figure out that two guys with very similar statistics are equally talented. I hate the Steelers.....with a PASSION....but I'm not so blindly stubborn in my diagnosis of talent. That's the difference. Even though I hate the team I'll give credit when due. My favorite team is the BEARS.... yet some of my all-time favorite players are NOT Chicago Bears. I recognize talent for what it is...not the jersey they wear.
Merge
Diamond Member
Diamond Member
Posts: 1023
Joined: Tuesday Jan 02, 2007
Location: Frostburg, Md.

Post by Merge »

The Bleacher Report does some good reporting on MMA. That's the only thing I look at on that site.
Pour me another one, cause I'll never find the silver lining in this cloud.
jetcitywoman
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Posts: 555
Joined: Wednesday Oct 05, 2011

Post by jetcitywoman »

Merge wrote:The Bleacher Report does some good reporting on MMA. That's the only thing I look at on that site.
i've found them spot on with their NFL reporting too
User avatar
sstuckey
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 485
Joined: Friday Dec 04, 2009
Location: Altoona

Post by sstuckey »

jetcitywoman wrote:
Merge wrote:The Bleacher Report does some good reporting on MMA. That's the only thing I look at on that site.
i've found them spot on with their NFL reporting too
Like the Superbowl with Green Bay vs Pittsburgh?! SPOT ON!!!!!
User avatar
sstuckey
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 485
Joined: Friday Dec 04, 2009
Location: Altoona

Post by sstuckey »

sstuckey wrote:
jetcitywoman wrote:
Merge wrote:The Bleacher Report does some good reporting on MMA. That's the only thing I look at on that site.
i've found them spot on with their NFL reporting too
Like the Superbowl with Green Bay vs Pittsburgh?! SPOT ON!!!!!
Oh wait both teams were one and done......guess it wasn't that spot on huh?!
Post Reply