Make your own Hussein speech.

[metalchurch]

...Plush Limbaugh...

--->JMS

Thats funny man, Ive never heard that one before.

[songsmith]

Thanks, I'm here all decade. It's my dig at a trust-fund baby who gets 40-mil a year for doing something the local guys would LOVE to get 40 grand a year for, and several of them are far more entertaining, and better at it. McGinnis(sp?) used to be pretty decent, but he's not fit to listen to since the last Tear Party. I think it was his first public gig, and they had a crowd... it goes to your head if you're not used to it. Of course they hold a party in Lakemont every week that pulls about 5 times more people. Maybe the Tear Partiers should have wings and beer. Anyway, Dr. John's really been bringing the "totalitarian" rants and "free-reign capitalism" crap to fever pitch. He's also been saying that ALL drugs should be legalized... you can hear conservative radios clicking off all over Blair County. --->JMS

[tornandfrayed]

Dude, I find the word Nigger offensive. Oh well. It could be on MSNBC and I would still find it offensive...

Scott, come on, who gives a shit if you like MJ? Nothing to do with this conversation.

My comments are pointed towards posts that are meant to inspire division. I don't care one way or the other. I do care about the future though, I have kids.

I have also been guilty of this. My only point is we should be working together to get answers and make resolutions politically. Not working against each other. This whole bitching and moaning gets so old.

I don't know Joe, but I do know a lot of the people on this board. Beyond that I know a lot of people in Blair county who do not agree with me politically but who are hard working people who are trying their best to do the right thing not only for their family but for their community.

That is where our focus should be.

No more name calling and no more bullshit? Could it be?

[RobTheDrummer]

Dude, I find the word Nigger offensive. Oh well. It could be on MSNBC and I would still find it offensive...

Scott, come on, who gives a shit if you like MJ? Nothing to do with this conversation.

My comments are pointed towards posts that are meant to inspire division. I don't care one way or the other. I do care about the future though, I have kids.

I have also been guilty of this. My only point is we should be working together to get answers and make resolutions politically. Not working against each other. This whole bitching and moaning gets so old.

I don't know Joe, but I do know a lot of the people on this board. Beyond that I know a lot of people in Blair county who do not agree with me politically but who are hard working people who are trying their best to do the right thing not only for their family but for their community.

That is where our focus should be.

No more name calling and no more bullshit? Could it be?

I only find it offensive when used in context of hatred. This is not the case. It's meant to be funny. I hear black people say it all the time, why is there a double standard?

[onegunguitar]

Dude, I find the word Nigger offensive. Oh well. It could be on MSNBC and I would still find it offensive...

Scott, come on, who gives a shit if you like MJ? Nothing to do with this conversation.

My comments are pointed towards posts that are meant to inspire division. I don't care one way or the other. I do care about the future though, I have kids.

I have also been guilty of this. My only point is we should be working together to get answers and make resolutions politically. Not working against each other. This whole bitching and moaning gets so old.

I don't know Joe, but I do know a lot of the people on this board. Beyond that I know a lot of people in Blair county who do not agree with me politically but who are hard working people who are trying their best to do the right thing not only for their family but for their community.

That is where our focus should be.

No more name calling and no more bullshit? Could it be?

I hear black people say it all the time, why is there a double standard?

I've always wondered that myself Rob.

[metalchurch]

Same as people who beat their kids. They'd be pissed off if someone else beat their kids... go figure.

[DirtySanchez]

Same as people who beat their kids. They'd be pissed off if someone else beat their kids... go figure.

hahahaha!

Reminds me of Rodney Carrington:

"Want me to whoop'em for ya? I'll whoop the shit out of'em."

[slackin@dabass]

Dude, I find the word Nigger offensive. Oh well. It could be on MSNBC and I would still find it offensive...

Scott, come on, who gives a shit if you like MJ? Nothing to do with this conversation.

My comments are pointed towards posts that are meant to inspire division. I don't care one way or the other. I do care about the future though, I have kids.

I have also been guilty of this. My only point is we should be working together to get answers and make resolutions politically. Not working against each other. This whole bitching and moaning gets so old.

I don't know Joe, but I do know a lot of the people on this board. Beyond that I know a lot of people in Blair county who do not agree with me politically but who are hard working people who are trying their best to do the right thing not only for their family but for their community.

That is where our focus should be.

No more name calling and no more bullshit? Could it be?

that's funny... a year ago, the only thing a dem could preach was anti-bush.

i think this goes pretty deep, man... i think your a self hater. just because your white dosn't mean you have to feel offended just because someone isn't being politically correct. ever watch BET standup comedy? ever get offended because they make fun of whitey? i don't, cuz i don't watch it. next time don't click the link and keep people from shitting in your cheerios.

[DrumAndDestroy]

http://www.filmdit.com/play.php?vid=160

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLInWGTq ... re=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_MrlkN-MWg


RACE WAR!!

[songsmith]

that's funny... a year ago, the only thing a dem could preach was anti-bush.

I remember a time when Bill Clinton was mentioned (blamed) every single hour on all right-wing media. Of course it was just 2 years ago... now it's more like every other hour.
A year ago, the only thing a republican could preach was that we weren't really in a recession.--->JMS

[Banned]

Anyway, Dr. John's really been bringing the "totalitarian" rants and "free-reign capitalism" crap to fever pitch. He's also been saying that ALL drugs should be legalized... you can hear conservative radios clicking off all over Blair County. --->JMS

John, I thought you liked Ron Paul. Well, ranting about totalitarianism, advocating free reign capitalism and promoting legalization of drugs is Ron Paul's position, it is called Libertarianism. Why are you upset when John McGinnis talks about these positions on his radio show? He has been an open libertarian on his radio show for years now, no change since the Tea Party. What's behind your rant?

[whitedevilone]

Please Dave,A few negative posts into the MJ thread i believe your quote was as follows"Wow the political differences bleed through every facet of our lives".Only after my post where i had a little fun with the freak and after RTD post pretty much callin Jacko a moloster.So don't act like YOU don't add a dose of political jab anytime you can because the proof is in the pudding brother.Libs,Consevatives,Rep,Dem it's all the same BS over and over and we get it.It just irks me when people try to pretend that they are above it,but in reality they're in the thick as deep as anyone.Peace.

[mistikalvalkrie]

this thread is exactly why I started out as an independant and will always remain one...because you're all a bunch of party-loving idiots who will continue fucking up this country unless you get your heads out of your asses and come up with some way to work together...

...okay, obviously not ALL of you have your craniums forcibly inserted into your anuses, but there's a little too many for comfort

[songsmith]

this thread is exactly why I started out as an independant and will always remain one...because you're all a bunch of party-loving idiots who will continue fucking up this country unless you get your heads out of your asses and come up with some way to work together...

...okay, obviously not ALL of you have your craniums forcibly inserted into your anuses, but there's a little too many for comfort

Gee, thanks for straightening all that out for us.
<Registered>JMS

[songsmith]

Anyway, Dr. John's really been bringing the "totalitarian" rants and "free-reign capitalism" crap to fever pitch. He's also been saying that ALL drugs should be legalized... you can hear conservative radios clicking off all over Blair County. --->JMS

John, I thought you liked Ron Paul. Well, ranting about totalitarianism, advocating free reign capitalism and promoting legalization of drugs is Ron Paul's position, it is called Libertarianism. Why are you upset when John McGinnis talks about these positions on his radio show? He has been an open libertarian on his radio show for years now, no change since the Tea Party. What's behind your rant?

Dr., and I use the term "doctor" very loosely based on his failed logic, Dr. John uses the term "totalitarian" to represent anything he does not agree with, but has to endure. His brand of voodoo, both economic and political, is fatally flawed, as is yours. He never mentions the giant downsides to his principles, because he's so self-centered, he simply can't allow reality to enter into it.
Authoritarian Neoconservatism is NOT conducive to personal liberty, because all liberties must be filtered through the Neoconservative authority. It's not liberty if I'm only allowed to do what makes you comfortable, and rich.
Totalitarianism is one-party system, which is exactly what you and he seek. You're both right-wing extremists, and there is no liberty to be had out there in the wings. Your reaction to every issue is to go farther right... how's that working out?
Capitalism is not the perfect system he and you claim. It has the same flaw as communism: If allowed, personal greed brings the whole system down, and I can provide any number of examples, beginning with a worlwide financial crisis brought on by a lack of oversight of the banking industry... as soon as laws were relaxed on toxic assets, those practices became the norm.
Legalizing the weed, would probably have a minor effect of the levels of drug abuse, and wouldn't likely have people stealing from my car to support their habit. Other harder drugs are more addictive, and people would die. You and John may not give a shite, but some people do. Plus, real social conservatives will NOT get behind drug legalization, or any change whatsoever.
Quit turning this into a Ron Paul infomercial. People had their chance to vote for him, and didn't, in droves. He allied himself with the people who got us to where we are, and you can boo-hoo all you want, but this Constitution you guys like to quote provides for free elections, and you lost fair and square. The People spoke. Don't pay your taxes, see if I give a sh*t, I'll write you in prison. Demonstrate all you want, the ballots have been cast and counted. Complain real loud if you like, I'll listen as I vote against you. It's still Majority Rule. I had to deal with the epic fails of the far-right for 8 years. Now it's YOUR turn.--->JMS

[Hawk]

Anyway, Dr. John's really been bringing the "totalitarian" rants and "free-reign capitalism" crap to fever pitch. He's also been saying that ALL drugs should be legalized... you can hear conservative radios clicking off all over Blair County. --->JMS

John, I thought you liked Ron Paul. Well, ranting about totalitarianism, advocating free reign capitalism and promoting legalization of drugs is Ron Paul's position, it is called Libertarianism. Why are you upset when John McGinnis talks about these positions on his radio show? He has been an open libertarian on his radio show for years now, no change since the Tea Party. What's behind your rant?

Dr., and I use the term "doctor" very loosely based on his failed logic, Dr. John uses the term "totalitarian" to represent anything he does not agree with, but has to endure. His brand of voodoo, both economic and political, is fatally flawed, as is yours. He never mentions the giant downsides to his principles, because he's so self-centered, he simply can't allow reality to enter into it.
Authoritarian Neoconservatism is NOT conducive to personal liberty, because all liberties must be filtered through the Neoconservative authority. It's not liberty if I'm only allowed to do what makes you comfortable, and rich.
Totalitarianism is one-party system, which is exactly what you and he seek. You're both right-wing extremists, and there is no liberty to be had out there in the wings. Your reaction to every issue is to go farther right... how's that working out?
Capitalism is not the perfect system he and you claim. It has the same flaw as communism: If allowed, personal greed brings the whole system down, and I can provide any number of examples, beginning with a worlwide financial crisis brought on by a lack of oversight of the banking industry... as soon as laws were relaxed on toxic assets, those practices became the norm.
Legalizing the weed, would probably have a minor effect of the levels of drug abuse, and wouldn't likely have people stealing from my car to support their habit. Other harder drugs are more addictive, and people would die. You and John may not give a shite, but some people do. Plus, real social conservatives will NOT get behind drug legalization, or any change whatsoever.
Quit turning this into a Ron Paul infomercial. People had their chance to vote for him, and didn't, in droves. He allied himself with the people who got us to where we are, and you can boo-hoo all you want, but this Constitution you guys like to quote provides for free elections, and you lost fair and square. The People spoke. Don't pay your taxes, see if I give a sh*t, I'll write you in prison. Demonstrate all you want, the ballots have been cast and counted. Complain real loud if you like, I'll listen as I vote against you. It's still Majority Rule. I had to deal with the epic fails of the far-right for 8 years. Now it's YOUR turn.--->JMS

Here Here !

[Banned]

John, I can only shake my head at your simplistic leftist answers to any truth that confronts you. You have more misconceptions in that one post that The Count from Sesame St. can count. Here are a couple of corrections.

Dr. John (he has a PhD.) and myself want less government, which by definition would mean less authoritarian and totalitarian rule. Only a true Kool aid drinker or a complete idiot would post that less governmental control over your life is totalitarian. Which are you?

There was not a right wing cabal the last 8 years. George W. Bush spent more money domestically than Bill Clinton, making him more leftist and socialist than Clinton. The right did not lose the last election, it was not even in the race.

Ron Paul, a libertarian by any definition of political positions, ran on the Republican ticket in the primaries for the purpose of having his ideas placed on the National scene. Not ever has a Libertarian candidate appeared on national TV on the Presidential campaign debates. His mission of spreading the Libertarian message was a success, millions heard his positions, that had never happened.

I did not know you were so in favor of the multi-trillion dollar war on drugs that is an abstract failure. The war on drugs is working so well. There are no people taking drugs in Blair co, right? Why there is not a single person in jail for a simple possession charge of maryjane, is there? The War on Drugs succeeds only in keeping the jailing industry the healthiest industry in this country. If you are proud of this, my opinion drops even farther, if that is possible.

There is a lawsuit in nearly every state against ACORN concerning voter fraud. That group is your Messiah's favorite racial rabble rousing activist group, isn't it? When each and every of those lawsuits are settled in favor of ACORN, then and only then will say it was a fair election.

[JackANSI]

There is a lawsuit in nearly every state against ACORN concerning voter fraud. That group is your Messiah's favorite racial rabble rousing activist group, isn't it? When each and every of those lawsuits are settled in favor of ACORN, then and only then will say it was a fair election.

I did a search and I couldn't find any posts from you complaining about the election results in 2000 or 2004.

[witchhunt]

Just went through the grocery store and one of the weekly liars headline read "Obama's gay lover lives at The White House and Michelle is furious."
Joe, did you have anything to do with that?

[Banned]

There is a lawsuit in nearly every state against ACORN concerning voter fraud. That group is your Messiah's favorite racial rabble rousing activist group, isn't it? When each and every of those lawsuits are settled in favor of ACORN, then and only then will say it was a fair election.

I did a search and I couldn't find any posts from you complaining about the election results in 2000 or 2004.

Duh, ACORN was not out committing crimes for the Republican candidate, only for socialist ones. So I had no reason to complain about ACORN, their candidate did not win.

[JackANSI]

There is a lawsuit in nearly every state against ACORN concerning voter fraud. That group is your Messiah's favorite racial rabble rousing activist group, isn't it? When each and every of those lawsuits are settled in favor of ACORN, then and only then will say it was a fair election.

I did a search and I couldn't find any posts from you complaining about the election results in 2000 or 2004.

Duh, ACORN was not out committing crimes for the Republican candidate, only for socialist ones. So I had no reason to complain about ACORN, their candidate did not win.

I guess it would have been ok if Obama's brother fixed the election alone

[Banned]

I did a search and I couldn't find any posts from you complaining about the election results in 2000 or 2004.

Duh, ACORN was not out committing crimes for the Republican candidate, only for socialist ones. So I had no reason to complain about ACORN, their candidate did not win.

I guess it would have been ok if Obama's brother fixed the election alone

Is that post supposed to make sense?

[JackANSI]

Duh, ACORN was not out committing crimes for the Republican candidate, only for socialist ones. So I had no reason to complain about ACORN, their candidate did not win.

I guess it would have been ok if Obama's brother fixed the election alone

Is that post supposed to make sense?

If you have a brain, it should.

[songsmith]

Dr. John (he has a PhD.) and myself want less government, which by definition would mean less authoritarian and totalitarian rule. .

You're not getting again.
You and Mr. I-Have-A-PHD-So-I'm-Right ARE the authoritarians. Everything in your world is according to you. You simply cannot abide any idea or any thing that does not fit into your personal view. When McGinnis uses terms like totalitarian, he only thinks that because he cannot change something to his liking, it is inherently wrong. He's a narcissist nutjob whose been ego-fed by an appearance at a picnic.
Let me prove my point:
The day after the first Tear Party, a report came from the office of Janet Napolitano, head of Homeland Security that said there are right-wingers who mean this country harm, and they should be dealt with. McGinnis couldn't deal with the idea that anyone would so insult conservatism by insinuating there are whacky-packs, that he stated that she said ALL conservatives should be watched. Untrue and inflammatory. I called him, buddy, and spoke to him live on the air. I pointed out that there was a Tear Party sign that read, "This is an unarmed movement... this time." He agreed with the sign. I flat-out asked him the exact following words: "Do you support the armed, violent overthrow of the US government?" His exact words were: "If that's what it takes." I asked him a second time, and he reiterated, while babbling a stream of "fascists" and "socialisms" and mentioned small government. I said, "Timothy McVeigh was a Republican who preached small government, shouldn't we have been watching him?"
He hung up. When you're f**ked, you're f**ked. He was stretched tighter than a drum for the rest of the hour, his voice hung an octave higher, and the rhetoric came long and hard. It was awesome!
You think he has any grasp on "The Truth?" There is no "Truth." Only "The Truth According To Dr. John."--->JMS