Yep.MoonManTom wrote:IIve played expensive guitars that played like
crap, then picked up a cheap guitar that played awesome! Its all about
the feel of the guitar!
Doesn't affect it at all (As evidenced by my "odd" gear).
I was, and am back to, using using a TubeWorks amp because after
getting rid of one, I wanted to get back what it did.
When I originally got my first, I didn't know of anyone who used them.
NOW, I know Jerry Cantrell used to use one of their power amps, Eric
Johnson and Gilmour have used their stuff, among others. Not bad
company to fall into.
But, the gear came before the knowledge of who else thought it was
good.
Got the Tech21 recently and then found out that Les Paul uses the
combo version of the pedal/preamp. Will admit, though, that one
of the things that got made me more secure that it would do what I
wanted was reading about a of session guys who use it one every
type of session, from jazz-to-jingles-to-pop-to heavier stuff. But these
are hardly big endorsement deals.
There's gear that I have no doubt is good. Just may not be what I'm
looking for whatever reason. I have no question that a Quad-posi-
trac-tri-rectal-mater 10 thousand with a dual quasi-moto and a 6-pack
on the floor Mesa can sound amazing. BUT, to get to that sound, how
loud does it have to be and is that going to work in my back line?
I may take an endorsement as a sign of reliability if someone really
is using it to tour, though, as Rob alluded, having techs on-hand to
fix anything or replacement gear on-hand can make you question
even that.
An endorsement, or even someone's name on something, isn't
necessarily goin' to make me discount it either, though.