Bush State Of The Union Prediction (by me).

Hawk · Post by **Hawk** » Monday Jan 22, 2007

LOL

Upcomming State of the Union Address.

Today's (1/22) Altoona Mirror Headlines

"Bush expected to renew focus on energy use"

Ha........nailed it.

Same Article :

"President Bush actually cut funding for the key energy saving technologies," says Joseph Romm, a former head of the renewable fuels and efficiency programs at the Energy Department during the Clinton Administration.

RobTheDrummer · Post by **RobTheDrummer** » Tuesday Jan 23, 2007

Liberal spin Bill. We cut some funding to Geothermal and Hydropower energies. We did this because private companies are able to take on these projects because the technology is already there. So, instead of funding that, we are pushing towards bio-fuels and such which would help on the gas and oil front. The government doesn't fund coal power plants, why should they fund these others? Leave it to the companies to get them running and not wastefully throw money at shit. Why do people believe that throwing money at everything works? It doesn't!

Hawk · Post by **Hawk** » Tuesday Jan 23, 2007

RobTheDrummer wrote:Liberal spin Bill. We cut some funding to Geothermal and Hydropower energies. We did this because private companies are able to take on these projects because the technology is already there. So, instead of funding that, we are pushing towards bio-fuels and such which would help on the gas and oil front. The government doesn't fund coal power plants, why should they fund these others? Leave it to the companies to get them running and not wastefully throw money at shit. Why do people believe that throwing money at everything works? It doesn't!

Rob, Rob, Rob. It cost LOTS of MONEY to do the research. In case you haven't noticed, we're still totally reliant on forign oil. We HAVE to spend the money for the research. This is not the republican rhetoric "Throwing money at it". Unless you enjoy being led by the nose by the oil barrons.

RobTheDrummer · Post by **RobTheDrummer** » Tuesday Jan 23, 2007

Hawk wrote:
RobTheDrummer wrote:Liberal spin Bill. We cut some funding to Geothermal and Hydropower energies. We did this because private companies are able to take on these projects because the technology is already there. So, instead of funding that, we are pushing towards bio-fuels and such which would help on the gas and oil front. The government doesn't fund coal power plants, why should they fund these others? Leave it to the companies to get them running and not wastefully throw money at shit. Why do people believe that throwing money at everything works? It doesn't!
Rob, Rob, Rob. It cost LOTS of MONEY to do the research. In case you haven't noticed, we're still totally reliant on forign oil. We HAVE to spend the money for the research. This is not the republican rhetoric "Throwing money at it". Unless you enjoy being led by the nose by the oil barrons.

Bill, Bill, Bill. Why throw money at something that has been researched and perfected already? That's up to the companies to start making these plants. Throw money at research for alternate fuels! Not electricity!

After seeing your post, I don't think you understood what I said. We actually agree on this Bill.

f.sciarrillo · Post by **f.sciarrillo** » Tuesday Jan 23, 2007

Tonight is the night - I will some it up for you all, seeing that it comes on in about 15 minutes.

"Iraq this, Iraq that" Standing ovation - Hillary Rolling her eyes while she claps, or maybe just sleeping. Some butchering of the english language with his "Unusual" metaphor's, more applause. Then more about Iraq and terrorism. He will then end with Ted Kennedy making a toast, even though he will already be baked.

Hawk · Post by **Hawk** » Tuesday Jan 23, 2007

RobTheDrummer wrote:
Hawk wrote:
RobTheDrummer wrote:Liberal spin Bill. We cut some funding to Geothermal and Hydropower energies. We did this because private companies are able to take on these projects because the technology is already there. So, instead of funding that, we are pushing towards bio-fuels and such which would help on the gas and oil front. The government doesn't fund coal power plants, why should they fund these others? Leave it to the companies to get them running and not wastefully throw money at shit. Why do people believe that throwing money at everything works? It doesn't!
Rob, Rob, Rob. It cost LOTS of MONEY to do the research. In case you haven't noticed, we're still totally reliant on foreign oil. We HAVE to spend the money for the research. This is not the republican rhetoric "Throwing money at it". Unless you enjoy being led by the nose by the oil barons.
Bill, Bill, Bill. Why throw money at something that has been researched and perfected already? That's up to the companies to start making these plants. Throw money at research for alternate fuels! Not electricity!

After seeing your post, I don't think you understood what I said. We actually agree on this Bill.

Rob ........ not used to you agreeing.
LOL.........my fault and apologies .

Take Care man !

Hawk · Post by **Hawk** » Tuesday Jan 23, 2007

When will he learn how to pronounce "nuclear" ?

Glad he mentioned Dar Fur. Hope he means it .

Banned · Post by **Banned** » Tuesday Jan 23, 2007

Hawk wrote:When will he learn how to pronounce "nuclear" ?

Glad he mentioned Dar Fur. Hope he means it .

Do you want us to go to Dar For or however its spelled, and start fighting radical Islamic facists? Ins't that what you hate W for doing now in Iraq?

Hawk · Post by **Hawk** » Tuesday Jan 23, 2007

undercoverjoe wrote:
Hawk wrote:When will he learn how to pronounce "nuclear" ?

Glad he mentioned Dar Fur. Hope he means it .
Do you want us to go to Dar For or however its spelled, and start fighting radical Islamic facists? Ins't that what you hate W for doing now in Iraq?

Right now genocide is goin on in Dar Fur. Diplomatic solutions can solve the problem. We shouldn't just ignore it like we have been doing. What do you think we should do ?

RobTheDrummer · Post by **RobTheDrummer** » Wednesday Jan 24, 2007

Hawk wrote:When will he learn how to pronounce "nuclear" ?

Glad he mentioned Dar Fur. Hope he means it .

I know, that nuke-u-lar always bothered me too.

lonewolf · Post by **lonewolf** » Wednesday Jan 24, 2007

"First, we must balance the federal budget. (Applause.) We can do so without raising taxes. (Applause.) What we need is impose spending discipline in Washington, D.C. We set a goal of cutting the deficit in half by 2009, and met that goal three years ahead of schedule. (Applause.) "

And how do we do this?

more money for troops...
more money for alternative energy...
more money for the strategic petroleum reserve...
more money for health insurance...
more money for no children left behind...
more money for AIDS...
more money for malaria in Africa...
more money for the Milennium Challenge Account...
more money for the Border Patrol...
more money for the wall...

This guy sounds more like a moderate democrat.

RobTheDrummer · Post by **RobTheDrummer** » Wednesday Jan 24, 2007

You are sooo right Lonewolf. Bush basically is a democrat.

f.sciarrillo · Post by **f.sciarrillo** » Wednesday Jan 24, 2007

I think most of last nights speech was to appease the democrats. He did say a lot of liberal things, it was the same thing he has been saying for the past six years. It will just go by the waste side and nothing will get done.

Banned · Post by **Banned** » Wednesday Jan 24, 2007

Hawk wrote:
undercoverjoe wrote:
Hawk wrote:When will he learn how to pronounce "nuclear" ?

Glad he mentioned Dar Fur. Hope he means it .
Do you want us to go to Dar For or however its spelled, and start fighting radical Islamic facists? Ins't that what you hate W for doing now in Iraq?
Right now genocide is goin on in Dar Fur. Diplomatic solutions can solve the problem. We shouldn't just ignore it like we have been doing. What do you think we should do ?

Defend Christians whenever they are being slaughtered by radical Islamic terrorists. Lets face it, the next world war will be against Islam extremists.

Diplomatic solutions with Islamic extremism is rather funny.

Banned · Post by **Banned** » Wednesday Jan 24, 2007

RobTheDrummer wrote:You are sooo right Lonewolf. Bush basically is a democrat.

Rob, once most Republicans get elected and go to the DC beltway, eventually they all become Democrats.

Republocrats. They are only interested in passing legislation that will help get them re-elected.

songsmith · Post by **songsmith** » Thursday Jan 25, 2007

lonewolf wrote:"First, we must balance the federal budget. (Applause.) We can do so without raising taxes. (Applause.) What we need is impose spending discipline in Washington, D.C. We set a goal of cutting the deficit in half by 2009, and met that goal three years ahead of schedule. (Applause.) "

And how do we do this?

more money for troops...
more money for alternative energy...
more money for the strategic petroleum reserve...
more money for health insurance...
more money for no children left behind...
more money for AIDS...
more money for malaria in Africa...
more money for the Milennium Challenge Account...
more money for the Border Patrol...
more money for the wall...

This guy sounds more like a moderate democrat.

My vote for post of the year. Kudos.------>JMS