ElvisToonaRockGuy wrote:The Beatles.lonewolf wrote:In defense of The Who, Who else had 2 movies?


I love the fact that this guy turns down the Fuel gig, then his first single is "Hemorrhage (in my Hands)" with different, worse lyrics ...bassist_25 wrote:Anyone who turns down a position with Fuel when the only thing worthwhile they've done so far is American Idol deserves the "Assclown of the Year" award.nitekast wrote:Alot of people are gonna be pissed but i definately think that Chris Daughtry doesnt deserve one. If it wasnt for american idol he'd still be flipping burgers. I dont see why everyone was all into him. He's an ok singer, not great. He probably doesnt write his songs or the music for them either.
Just because you don't like his voice doesn't mean you can say they never deserved a record deal. That's a shitty remark on your part because you are a musician and some people won't like your music or whatever instrument you play. You should know that. I don't even know you, but you're in Bad Daze, and I dont know what kind of music you play but you should know that some people just won't like it for whatever reason. If you were in the position to be signed I don't think one person of a band should or would be the deal-breaker. So you can't justify that comment as being an actual answer to the question asked just because the singer annoys you. Why don't you worry about making more of a valid and substance-based comment if you're going to make outlandish statements like that.BadDazeRob wrote:
• Zepplin — Sorry, but for me, it's all about Plant's voice. Nails on a chalkboard.
r:>)
Apparently pissed off a Zepplin fan. You must be in the effing band to take my post so damned personally.Lifer wrote:Just because you don't like his voice doesn't mean you can say they never deserved a record deal. That's a shitty remark on your part because you are a musician and some people won't like your music or whatever instrument you play. You should know that. I don't even know you, but you're in Bad Daze, and I dont know what kind of music you play but you should know that some people just won't like it for whatever reason. If you were in the position to be signed I don't think one person of a band should or would be the deal-breaker. So you can't justify that comment as being an actual answer to the question asked just because the singer annoys you. Why don't you worry about making more of a valid and substance-based comment if you're going to make outlandish statements like that.BadDazeRob wrote:
• Zepplin — Sorry, but for me, it's all about Plant's voice. Nails on a chalkboard.
r:>)
DING! DING! DING!YankeeRose wrote:Ya know, this has actually turned out to be one of the most amusing threads in a long time. Basically: "WHAT!?!You believe (Insert Band you like here.) shouldn't have been signed??? How DARE you!" Then commences the sometimes vehement defense of said Band. Everyone is entitled to their dislikes and opinions. There are some I agree with, some I don't, but it doesn't really matter. I can almost certainly assure you the ones who are signed and successful really don't care WHO likes them as much as you do.
One of the best rock bands of all time with one of the greatest rock bassists of all time.Naga wrote: One I'll probably get some trashing for, but I do have to add here and now, since I just thought of them... The Who. I'll give them the respect they deserve, they've probably influenced many of the people who've influenced me. They've developed a place in rock history that can't be denied, and in their own right, they'd became more than most bands of their era
But then in all reality, most of their songs to me are overly hokey, really out of anything I'd consider ingenius. They, in their time, can be compared to most of the aforementioned bands by the way they wrote, the way they played, and how much I think they sucked. Although, I will say they wrote one song that I'll always consider a great song... Behind Blue Eyes. Save for that one song, between their arrogance and their horrible sound (to my ears at least), they'll always be in one of the pits of music in my mind
There's alot that don't "desserve" it. I don't own one single Led Zepplin album. I don't consider myself a huge fan, but I do like them. The content in the beginning of this thread was "worst band to get a record deal" then it turned into bands that don't deserve a record deal. It's hard to understand a person's tone on a messageboard. The tone of everyone's post made it seem like the bands they were talking about didn't deserve it or "desserve" it.. You can't pull the whole"it's my opinion" thing and make it justified because your previous statement was completely unfounded. You said they are the worst band to get signed, just on the voice, apparently you didn't read when I said "one person wouldn't/shouldn't be a deal-breaker. That's just bad musicianship to me.BadDazeRob wrote:Apparently pissed off a Zepplin fan. You must be in the effing band to take my post so damned personally.Lifer wrote:Just because you don't like his voice doesn't mean you can say they never deserved a record deal. That's a shitty remark on your part because you are a musician and some people won't like your music or whatever instrument you play. You should know that. I don't even know you, but you're in Bad Daze, and I dont know what kind of music you play but you should know that some people just won't like it for whatever reason. If you were in the position to be signed I don't think one person of a band should or would be the deal-breaker. So you can't justify that comment as being an actual answer to the question asked just because the singer annoys you. Why don't you worry about making more of a valid and substance-based comment if you're going to make outlandish statements like that.BadDazeRob wrote:
• Zepplin — Sorry, but for me, it's all about Plant's voice. Nails on a chalkboard.
r:>)
Dude, I never said they didn't deserve a record deal. The topic of the thread is, "worst band to get a record deal" not, "What signed bands didn't desserve their record deal?"
I can't stand Led Zepplin and Plant is the reason why. IMO, obviously not IYO, Zepplin's music as a whole is unappealing because I do not care for the vocalist's sound. And yes, I'm well aware that not everyone on the planet is a fan of bad daZe. If they were, I'd be sitting by my pool in Malibu, not preparing to cover a goddam township meeting later tonight.![]()
Others have pointed out in this very thread that they like other bands instrumentally but don't like the vocalist (Creed) and no Creed fans are crying. Geez.
I justify my statement simply: I'm entitled to dislike Led Zepplin, no matter how big of a fan base they have and no matter how much you apparently like them. I'm a free American entitled to opinion.
I don't like crab legs either, but that doesn't mean they aren't popular and don't belong on the menu at Red Lobster.
Sorry for peeing in your corn flakes.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Yes, I can pull the whole, "It's my opinion" thing because ... it's my opinion. I listed them with two other acts (and there are others) that I "can't stand." To me, IMO, the three acts I listed are among the "worst bands to get signed" ... in my opnion.Lifer wrote:You can't pull the whole"it's my opinion" thing and make it justified because your previous statement was completely unfounded.
Here we go with another food analogy. I love bacon cheeseburgers. I could eat one every day. However, if the federal government passed a law that all bacon cheeseburgers consumed in America must be served with a slathering of peanut butter, then I would no longer like bacon cheeseburgers. One bad element can ruin the entire product.Lifer wrote:You said they are the worst band to get signed, just on the voice, apparently you didn't read when I said "one person wouldn't/shouldn't be a deal-breaker. That's just bad musicianship to me.
That's some pretty heady company.ZappasXWife wrote:Bob DylanToonaRockGuy wrote:
lonewolf wrote:
In defense of The Who, Who else had 2 movies?
The Beatles.
Elvis
While I'm busy pissing people off, this is the same reason I can't listen to Rush.BadDazeRob wrote:For me, Plant's voice is the peanut butter that ruins the whole burger, even though I'm sure I'd love the beef patty, the bacon, the cheddar cheese and everything else on it if it weren't coated with peanut butter.
r:>)
BadDazeRob wrote:While I'm busy pissing people off, this is the same reason I can't listen to Rush.BadDazeRob wrote:For me, Plant's voice is the peanut butter that ruins the whole burger, even though I'm sure I'd love the beef patty, the bacon, the cheddar cheese and everything else on it if it weren't coated with peanut butter.
r:>)![]()
![]()
r:>)
That's an interesting chunk of meat, isn't it?DrumAndDestroy wrote:This is the EXACT reason I can't tell my friends on the Weight-Watchers message boards that I am also a RockPage member...